Talk:Georgia Hall

Georgia Hall has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 24, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Women in Green: Wildcard Edition

This article was created or improved during the Wildcard Edition GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in May 2025. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's golf task force.

Is Georgia hall parents alive?

Is Georgia hall parent alive? 102.90.103.170 (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Why is the surname incorrect? Should be Georgia Ball according to her own social media 2A00:23C6:98A2:601:A1F7:E385:7C63:824C (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Titles or Eight???

The infobox says she has won 8 professional titles and these are 1)Generali de Strasbourg 2)Victorian Open 3)British Open 4) Cambia Portland 5)Rose Open 6)Rose Open 7) Saudi Ladies. What is the eighth?

Her infobox says 2 Euro Tour wins, 2 LPGA Tour wins, 1 APGA win and 3 others, but her British Open win seems to be included in both her Euro wins and LPGA wins as that tournament forms part of both Tours, therefore is it being counted twice in the eight? Thanks for any help. Canary757 (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected to 7 total. Tewapack (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Canary757 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Georgia Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Canary757 (talk · contribs) 06:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 20:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will have a review up for this article within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thankyou for taking the time to review this page.Canary757 (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Canary757: Here is my review. I only have a couple of comments/questions in the bullet points below for you to address. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks again for your time. I've made a start and will finish tomorrow. I'll let you know when I'm done. Kind regards. Canary757 (talk) 12:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've swapped affect to effect, removed tough start, and adjusted the puncuation. With regards to the verifiability in the team appearances section, basically if they were mentioned and therefore referenced in the prose I didn't reference them a second time in the list, but I did reference some smaller events which weren't included in the prose. However, to avoid confusion, I have added named references for all of them now.Canary757 (talk) 08:42, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, makes sense to me. I will pass this article. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
I went through and added some commas where they were needed.

At the tournament, Hall missed the cut by ten-strokes at Lancaster Country Club. Pennsylvania, after shooting fourteen-over-par. Should be a comma instead of a period after Lancaster Country Club
After she began playing on the LPGA Tour, Hall initially found it difficult adjusting her game in the United States, and after a tough start she asked former golf professionals Ken Brown and Tom Lehman for advice. I would take out the phrase "tough start" unless you can specifically describe what was "tough" about it.
Hall declined the opportunity to compete for Great Britain at the Tokyo Summer Olympics in 2021, citing concerns about her "exhausting schedule" and the affect it would have on her preparation for upcoming events. Should be "effect".
The Personal life section places punctuation marks after the quotation marks, which is customary in British English, but this is not consistent with the rest of the article.

2. Verifiable
The article uses reliable sources. Earwig's does not show obvious copyright violations. Spot check: 2, 16, 20, 42, 59, 68, 84, 92 - all support the information and are not plagiarized.

Is there a reason there is not a citation for every bullet in the Team appearances section?

3. Broad
The article addressed the major aspects of her life and career without unnecessary details.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its tone and properly attributes opinions.

5. Stable
I looked through the talk page and edit history to verify there are no ongoing content disputes.

6. Illustrated
The one image used is tagged with its copyright status, is relevant, and has a suitable caption.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.