Talk:Fusobacteriota

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 2 April 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Fusobacteriati. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Plagiarism in article

Part of this article appears to be copied from this abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8411084/ 47.19.177.246 (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you clarify? which portions? AGIwithTheBraids (talk) 23:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 April 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 03:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fusobacteriota → Fusobacteriati – I think we should use the kingdom name instead of the phylum name. Jako96 (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 03:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. If we use WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA and WP:MONOTYPICFLORA as a guide for naming articles on monotypic bacterial taxa, we first consider the common name in scientific publications along with other general WP naming conventions. If these determinations are inconclusive, we then use the name of the lowest ranked monotypic taxon. Google Scholar gives 3,560 hits for Fusobacteriales; 3,070 hits for Fusobacteriota; 1,400 for Fusobacteriia; and only 3 hits for Fusobacteriati. (Note that order Fusobacteriales contains three families and is therefore not monotypic.) Fusobacteriota is the clear common name and should therefore remain as the article title. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 14:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For additional context on this discussion, see Talk:Thermotogae#Requested_move_1_April_2025 which resulted in keeping the common name (which is also the lowest ranked taxon in this case) and the as yet unresolved discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#Which_Taxon_Should_Be_The_Article_Name_In_Monotypy_Situations_for_Fungi,_Prokaryotes_and_Protista?. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 14:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Consideration of Mid-Importance to WikiProject Microbiology

I think this page should be considered of mid-importance to WikiProject Microbiology. Jako96 (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]