Talk:Femalia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Date style in references

In this article, publication dates (and revision dates, if any) are given with the month spelled out, while access (retrieval) and archival dates are given in strictly numerical ISO 8601 format. Please do not change the access and archival dates to any format other than ISO 8601, including the format used for publication dates. Also, please do not change the publication and revision dates to ISO 8601, or to any format that does not fully spell out the month.

The difference in format serves a useful purpose. The ISO 8601 format makes access and archival dates less conspicuous, while drawing more attention to the publication and revision dates, which are likely to be of more interest to readers. Use of the same format for all dates in citations makes the article worse, not better.

—Syrenka V (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]