Talk:Equatorial Guinea

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Equatorial Guinea article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 16 months

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 12, 2011, October 12, 2012, October 12, 2014, October 12, 2015, and October 12, 2016.

Africa: Equatorial Guinea Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was created or improved during the "African 10,000 Challenge", which started in 1 September 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Government

Per MOS:IBP, the template should summarize the key details from the article; the article should remain complete with the template ignored. As such, there shouldn't be details included there that aren't in the article body. This edit should be reverted. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These types of details have been a mainstay of many government infoboxes and should remain so. You have no consensus to makes these edits and should have made a talk page before making these edits. ErickTheMerrick (talk) 08:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Claiming the country is a dominant-party system should only be included if very important, and that should be supported by body inclusion. I'm wary of including it as a contrasting point to "under a dictatorship", they are both aspects of the same government control. CMD (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - only those key facts as discussed in the article should be added. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]