Talk:Episode 7116

Episode 7116 is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) at 16:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Note: I pledge to review another Television article when this gets reviewed

Short description: 2025 episode of EastEnders

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (British TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

EastEnders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBC soap opera EastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders

Tasks for WikiProject EastEnders:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : All articles listed in Category:Stub-Class EastEnders articles and Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective
Other :
- Improve to FA standard: EastEnders: E20
- Improve to GA standard: EastEnders
- Maintain: List of EastEnders characters (2023), List of EastEnders characters, List of former EastEnders characters, List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders
- Get involved in the Wikipedia EastEnders Project.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion on naming convention for articles on unnamed TV episodes

There is a discussion underway at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Titling episode articles without titles that would affect how articles like this one are named. Srleffler (talk) 23:51, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 7116/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 16:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 21:57, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article to fulfil the pledge I made for Talk:765874 – Unification/GA1. I will try to get to it in the next few days. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:57, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And no rush! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Criteria 1

Some things to address:

and nods to the Britain during World War II -- should this just be "and nods to Britain during World War II"?
Don't need to capitalise "Early onset dementia" in the middle of a sentence, and there is one instance where "Young onset dementia" is used which should probably be consistent with the other "early" instances.
"Queen Vice" typo in a few places
The plot summary is a little long based on the 400 word guideline at MOS:TVPLOT, but also there seems to be a lot going on in this episode and as it is there are a few places that could probably do with a bit more info ("to make it up to her", "why he hid Joel's crime", etc.). My feeling is try to keep it as short as possible but maybe go over it to make sure there is a basic explanation for each bit for readers who haven't seen the show. Some bits are covered in the production section so maybe don't need as much detail in the summary.
marked 50th anniversary of VE Day -- "marked the 50th anniversary of VE Day"
organised a street party in the soap for the characters of the soap -- "of the soap" not needed here
Other spoilers revealed -- I'm not sure this is the right term to use here, maybe "leaks" or "early reports"
reopen it in time VE Day -- "reopen it in time for VE Day"
Can you clarify when it was added to BBC iPlayer?
I think the reception section overdoes it a bit with quotation marks, particularly for single words that are already obviously coming from a reviewer. For example, opined that it had a "tragic" twist for Nigel does not need quotes as it is clear that "tragic twist" is an opinion from the source.

- adamstom97 (talk) 17:30, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I will do these later today - thank you for the review! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria 2

copyvio tool finds no likely copyright issues. I have spot checked the sources and found no issues. link-dispenser tool also finds no issues, and I appreciate the formatting and archives for the references. There are some places where the same in-line citation is being used to support multiple sentences in a row, in those cases you can just have the citation at the end of the last sentence rather than repeating it each sentence. My main concern here is the use of Metro as it is listed as unreliable at WP:RS/PS. My feeling is that in this context it should be okay to use in the reception section, but if it can be replaced with better sources in the production section then that would be ideal. - adamstom97 (talk) 17:30, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Adamstom.97:, per WP:METROSOAPS the use of Metro is allowed on Soap opera related articles. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, should have looked one line down! - adamstom97 (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria 6

I think the article is just small enough for one image to be okay, if it was expanded much I would probably think that a second image would be helpful. Image is free, recommend that alt text be added per MOS:ALT. - adamstom97 (talk) 17:30, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review status

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·