Talk:Edward Latymer
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The image Image:Oldcoatofarms.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
The Bell Inn and the Angel Inn were on different sites. Both appear on the same 1865 edition of the 1:2500 Ordnance Survey map. The Bell Inn was on Fore Street opposite the junction with Trafalgar Place (roughly at coordinates N51:36:47 W0:03:55). The site is now a council estate and a shopping parade.
The Angel Inn was approximately 210 metres to the north of the Bell Inn on the north-west corner of the junction of Silver Street and Fore Street, and was demolished to make way for the A406 North Circular underpass.
The Angel Inn was quite close to the bridge that took Fore Street over Pymmes Brook so was most likely the correct location of Edward Latymer's property.--MJLemin (talk) 09:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi all, as google sometimes displays the alternative, I would like to state the following for all potential contributors
there are NO known depictions of Edward Latymer, two always spring up though so I would like to debunk them individually
Image 1: This image originates from The Latymer School Edmonton and was originally used on their website to show off “Latymer House”, however, this image is an obvious trace of the painting of the Martyr Hugh Latimer
Image 2: William Wheatley initially believed that this figure (taken from the Court of Wards and Liveries painting of 1588) depicted Edward. This misconception arose because a letter from Edmund English was mistakenly dated as 1578 instead of 1598, leading Wheatley to assume that Edward would have been present when the painting was created(though when he did become a clerk, the view in the painting wouldn’t have been too different from what Edward actually saw). --The Watcher5292 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
