Jump to content

Talk:Dungka!/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Relayed (talk · contribs) 11:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 09:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article, Relayed. I will update you once I review and my suggestions or recommendations. ROY is WAR Talk! 09:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]
Good Article Status - Review Criteria
Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
    (c) it contains no original research; and
    (d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. [4]
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. [5]
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]

Notes

  1. ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
  2. ^ Footnotes must be used for in-line citations.
  3. ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
  4. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  5. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  6. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

Review

[edit]
  1. Well-written:
    2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) good led section Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) It is aligned on MoS. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
    3. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The reviewer has left no comments here Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) All source that used on the article are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) no OR which is good. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) It is low or no copyvio and plagiarism are detected. Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) There's a missing section which is the "on popular culture" or "In other media," which I found this article [1]. On hold On hold
    (b) (focused) It is no unnecessarily added on the article which is good. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. Notes Result
    So far, I don't see anything bias words encountered. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. Comment Result
    Relatively new and no sign of edit warring or ongoing Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) All fair use images and audios are okay. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) The reviewer has left no comments here Pass Pass

Result

[edit]
Result Notes
On hold On hold Relayed, I finish my review, if you have any questions or suggestions that could be work, please add on the discussion section.

Discussion

[edit]
Hi, Roy! Thanks for doing the review. I'll look into your comment shortly. Relayed (talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: Hi, Roy! Your comment has been actioned. While adding it, I also came across a feature for Fatal Fury. However, having a separate "In other media" is not feasible at the moment, since it would be too short. I think the added info could fall under "Music video and promotion" for now. Let me know if you have anything else. Relayed (talk • contribs) 18:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Relayed Great! I noticed the Dungka § Monthly charts section, please wikilink the Top P-pop Songs and it can be pass this article. ROY is WAR Talk! 07:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Royiswariii: Hi again, Roy! It's now wikilinked. Relayed (talk • contribs) 07:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dungka!/GA1&oldid=1296013323"