Talk:Deus Ex (video game)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deus Ex (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Deus Ex" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 31 days ![]() |
![]() | Deus Ex (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
|
|||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
![]() | The content of Development of Deus Ex was merged into Deus Ex (video game) on 26 July 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
The article has lots of uncited prose, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 23:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
It predicted 9/11
[edit]11 Glitch2109 (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Article rewrite/tidy
[edit]Right. I'm pretty close to finishing up a massive rewrite and tidying of this article, hopefully to bring it back to GA status after it rightly lost it in January this year. The remaining outstanding sections are bits of Reception, and the Legacy/Sequel section. Other eyes as now and afterwards would be more than welcome.
Alerting editors @PresN, TheJoebro64, and Cukie Gherkin: as I talked with them about the article and associated ones via Discord. ProtoDrake (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- If there's a way I can help, let me know. I've had my eye on it but it's admittedly overwhelming, given how much this game is talked about in sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Shooterwalker: Yes! Thank you, if and/or when you can. --ProtoDrake (talk) 23:27, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Deus Ex (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 18:57, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
This article appears to be in excellent form. I don't anticipate this review being very long. ♦ JAGUAR 13:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Lead
- "The game was built using the Unreal Engine, which led to issues with coding and NPC behavior" - link non-player character
- " but many praised its translation of the game's mechanics to console" - is translation the right term here? Also, link game mechanics
- I recall specifically the game's voice acting received the most criticism - would replacing 'audio' for 'voice acting' be more accurate?
- Body
- "A port of the game for PlayStation 2, titled Deus Ex:" - as 'PS2' is abbreviated later on, I would include it in brackets here
- "Matthew Kato praised the adaptation of the PC original's controls to the PS2's DualShock" - link DualShock for readers unfamiliar with the controller
- "...impressed by how well the PC original's mechanics and depth had been translated into a console game experience" - again, I'm not quite sure, but I'll leave it to you
I believe this article is at an FA-standard already; it meets every aspect of the GA criteria including comprehensiveness, excellent prose, and high quality sources. Other than those minor nitpicks, reading the article was a smooth experience. Glad to bestow this an outright pass. Well done. Jaguar (talk) 10:35, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- GA-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- GA-Class video game articles
- High-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Mid-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class Transhumanism articles
- Low-importance Transhumanism articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists