Talk:Descendants of Smith
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of Garden of Uranium was merged into Descendants of Smith on 7 October 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with Garden of Uranium
[edit]Simply a reissue, under another title. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Will any information be lost? Or will it all transpose to the new page? Stephenjh (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Anyone? This is the discussion page right. Stephenjh (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No discussion here leads me to believe, that after three months, this proposed merge tag can be removed. Furthermore, are all reissues to be merged? If so, why is there a separate category for reissued albums? Are they all due to be merged? "Category:Reissue albums" Stephenjh (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No the tag should not be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, how long does the 'discussion' (that isn't happening) take? Stephenjh (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- WP:NODEADLINE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, how long does the 'discussion' (that isn't happening) take? Stephenjh (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No the tag should not be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No discussion here leads me to believe, that after three months, this proposed merge tag can be removed. Furthermore, are all reissues to be merged? If so, why is there a separate category for reissued albums? Are they all due to be merged? "Category:Reissue albums" Stephenjh (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No; no information should be lost. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Confirming that no information will be lost and it will redirect. Given the absence of objections (except on the grounds of no action), and the presence of a clear justification (initial proposal), I'll take action and merge. Klbrain (talk) 11:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Anyone? This is the discussion page right. Stephenjh (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)