Talk:Deafness in China

peer review

Hi! I am going to be reviewing your article!

Caroline.s2006 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello! :) I will start off by saying that you do a great job of remaining neutral throughout the article. Nothing stood out as biased or heavily expressive in any section of the piece, which is great! I think that the EI section was the hardest part to do this but it is very neutral and has a lot of interesting statistics. I like the statement at the end about audiology not being a recognized profession in China because it is somewhat surprising but still remains a neutral statement. I had just a bit of trouble going through the CRPD section, but I assume it is just unfinished right now. I like that you have this section organized by article from the state party report with the titles of each article because that makes it very intuitive to the reader. I do think that if possible, your writing about Article 29 could be a little more detailed - what are some examples of laws that makes representation of disabled people difficult? Your statistics and citations in the UNHS section are great and very easy to comprehend, as well as in the EI section! I would recommend adding any methods aside from introduction of medical intervention that are used in the country if you have the information available, but if not, the section is very substantial as it is. Your citations look great and all were accessible! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caroline.s2006 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 24 February 2025 (UTC)