Talk:Datarails

Datarails update

The company states on its linkedin that there HQ is in NY, also the user @User:Thehelpingfriendlybook is adding information that is not sourced (403 forbidden), along with removing references regarding locations. Will be happy if some senior editor can sort this out.Tereraheel (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thehelpingfriendlybook, (courtesy ping because the first one didn't work), The link works for me. As I'm not INVOLVED, I'm willing to act as a third opinion for this issue. @Tereraheel, You need something other than linkedin as a source to claim they are based in New York, especially considering it's already sourced. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Full disclosure I am a neutral advisor in this space and my focus is transparency. I have clients who have alerted me of this companies positioning. I think @Tereraheel should understand that this page serves as a repository of truth and information, and is not a marketing channel. The controversy is important to note for transparency, as is the location of the company. Thehelpingfriendlybook (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the Company's own webpage and Terms of Service referencing that they are, in fact, an Israeli company. https://www.datarails.com/terms-of-service-2/ Thehelpingfriendlybook (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thehelpingfriendlybook, is this company your client? I think you might need to do a COI disclosure. I'm going to wait for @Tereraheel to respond before making any final judgements. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 20:48, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No - not a client. Thanks. Thehelpingfriendlybook (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

User:Alachuckthebuck , i work in financial industry, needed help with FP&A , so i came accross this page, i read the page and couldn't find source for the controversy section and when i searched online it appears that it is based in NY https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/datarails

So i thought to fix it. The other user it seems working on behalf of someone to deliberately add negative info.. so that is why i asked for a senior editor's feedback. Tereraheel (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not cast aspersions without evidence. I have restored the criticism section you removed without explanation and acknowledged the fact that the company has HQ in both cities. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 09:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been hijacked as a marketing ploy. Please look at some of the latest edits by a user called "avivDC." https://www.linkedin.com/in/avivcanaani Thehelpingfriendlybook (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]