Talk:Dalziel baronets
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 21 June 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Baronetage of the United Kingdom. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 21 June 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Dalziel baronets → Baronetage of the United Kingdom – redirect to Baronetage of the United Kingdom this page does not pass GNG on its own, all claims in the page are cited elsewhere. This probably is better as a category. Nayyn (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- This should be speedily closed, as it is not a request to rename a page, but rather a suggestion to delete a page. This is the wrong forum for that. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose. OP, bring this to WP:AFD if you like. 162 etc. (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy procedural close wrong process. If you want to merge and redirect WP:Proposed mergers is that way -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 22:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is really a disambiguation page, and the edit summary creating the page said "disambiguation" (Special:Diff/431037116). For that purpose, though, "Baron Dalziel" seems better, if both baronets were barons. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Part of a long series on baronetcies. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.