Talk:Creative Biolabs
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Request to Add Company Logo in Infobox
[edit]Hello, I would like to disclose that I have a conflict of interest, as I am affiliated with Creative Biolabs. To improve the article, I propose to add the official logo of Creative Biolabs to the infobox for better identification of the company.
It needs to be changed to:
logo = Creative_Biolabs,_Shirley_NY.jpg
Source: https://www.clinisciences.com/en/merk/Creative-biolabs Rationale: The logo is intended for identification purposes in a non-commercial, encyclopedic context. It helps readers recognize the company more easily and adds to the completeness of the article. License: Low-resolution image used under fair use for identification in the article about the organization. I will not make the edit myself due to the conflict of interest and kindly request that an uninvolved editor review and consider adding the logo to the infobox. Thank you for your time and consideration. — Sherwinbrown1 (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I checked your source and updated the logo for you. Liliswift2005 (talk) 02:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your time and assistance! Sherwinbrown1 (talk) 07:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- I just handled the logo tagging issue, but then realized the file name for the logo was entered incorrectly. The correct one should be:
- logo = Creative Biolabs, Shirley NY.jpg.
- Could you please help update it accordingly? Thanks a lot! Sherwinbrown1 (talk) 07:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help, but no further changes are needed. The current version is already correct. Thanks! Sherwinbrown1 (talk) 06:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Proposed sources for notability and article improvement
[edit]Dear Wikipedia editors,
I'm affiliated with Creative Biolabs, and I've disclosed my affiliation on this page.
To assist with improving and possibly establishing notability under WP:CORP, I’ve collected a set of independent, third-party sources that may be relevant. These include peer-reviewed journal articles, industry reports, news coverage, and scholarship-related mentions. I understand that not all sources may be suitable, so I would greatly appreciate it if experienced editors could help review them and advise on which sources (if any) could be appropriately incorporated into the article.
Peer-reviewed journal references: (Please note that in most of these, Creative Biolabs products or services are used by independent researchers or cited as part of experiments.)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01674
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c06052
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/2/6/pgad170/7192954
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41919-x
https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/83/8/1214/725109
https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(22)00229-4
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37324-z
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42669-6
https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/29/15/2508/5867075
https://jitc.bmj.com/content/10/7/e004991
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.14638
News/media mentions:
Industry reports (non-company affiliated):
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/immunotoxins-market-report
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/circrna-synthesis-market-report
https://www.verifiedmarketreports.com/product/recombinant-anti-helicobacter-pylori-antibody-market/
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/cell-cryopreservation-market-A11917
Mentions related to scholarship and education:
Any input on the relevance of these sources would be deeply appreciated. Please let me know if you'd recommend including any of them in the article or if further improvements are needed. Many thanks in advance!