Talk:Corruption in China

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Corruption in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202232159/http://www.transparency.org./news_room/latest_news/press_releases_nc/2006/2006_12_08_chinese_nis to http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases_nc/2006/2006_12_08_chinese_nis
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090714002914/http://www.nbcp.gov.cn/ to http://www.nbcp.gov.cn/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases/2007/2007_08_23_construction_china
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210040251/http://www.csis.org/index.php?option=com_csis_progj&task=view&id=1029 to http://www.csis.org/index.php?option=com_csis_progj&task=view&id=1029

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

feel like the intro needs to be rewritten....

any objections?Happy monsoon day 00:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

guessing that means no objectionsHappy monsoon day 18:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Health bribery scandals?

What about the bribery scandals involving GSK and Sanofi? [1][2] --Signimu (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Countermeasures section seems to lack neutrality and one of the sources is being used a little too generously for how outdated it is

Initially noticed the section due to some biased wording ("The CPC has tried a variety of anti-corruption measures, constructing a variety of laws and agencies in an attempt to stamp out corruption, but almost none have been proven to be even mildly effective."), but I'm confused at a source in this section being used over and over. Source 21 (Michael Johnston, "Corruption in China: Old Ways, New Realities and a Troubled Future", United Nations Public Administration Network. Retrieved January 29, 2010) is almost twenty years old and seems like a somewhat outdated source to continuously reference in a section like Countermeasures, considering the advent of a large anti-corruption campaign was created in 2012. Also, the Means section fails to attribute a full-quote to an author, but I'm new to Wikipedia and not sure if I should amend the quotation marks or remove it entirely since the two sentences are a direct-quote.

Means section: "The PLA has also become a major economic player, and participant in large- and small-scale corruption at the same time. Inconsistent tax policy, and a politicised and poorly organised banking system, create ample opportunities for favouritism, kickbacks, and "outright theft," according to Michael Johnston, Professor of Political Science at Colgate University in Hamilton, New York."

Sourced material: "The People's Liberation Army has become a major economic player -- and participant in corruption both grand and petty -- in its own right. Changing and inconsistently-enforced tax policies, and a politicized, poorly-organized system of banking and finance, create numerous opportunities for favoritism, kickbacks, and outright theft. "

Perhaps Countermeasures section could include links to some of the "See Also" articles like this

• Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping
• Crime in China
• Anti-Corruption and Governance Research Center, School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University
• International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (IAACA) in Beijing
• Three-anti/five-anti campaigns (1951/1952)
• Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China
• National Supervisory Commission
• Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)
• Commission Against Corruption (Macau)

Could someone let me know if there's an established way of going about editing a section that leans in too heavily on outdated info? Also confused at the citations section, it looks like citation styles are used indiscriminately but not sure which style was used first. Coldcough (talk) 09:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Page move suggestion

Any validity to move this page to Corruption in China to have corruption under the People's Republic to be its own section, and include other historical instances of corruption, as surely corruption in China existed before its current government. DaltonCastle (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

rephrased HudecEmil (talk) 10:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)