Talk:Common sense
Appearance
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Common sense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Common sense is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 22 July 2013 for a period of one week. |
“Commonsense” ??
[edit]Is it helpful/useful to SOMEHOW indicate/explain that (according to Wikt:commonsense) the form WITHOUT A SPACE (e.g., commonsense reasoning) means essentially the same thing / adjective… ?? Curious1i (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- This is not a dictionary, like wiktionary, and so we don't need to define all related words. The topic of the article is primarily the noun, not the adjective.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 04:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class epistemology articles
- High-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- B-Class logic articles
- High-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- B-Class ethics articles
- High-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Wikipedia former articles for improvement