Talk:Collaborative therapy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Collaborative therapy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

The material in "Criticism" is applied incorrectly. It is sourced to a powerpoint presentation which is not about Collaborative Language Systems therapy but about a medical/behavioral health collaboration. The critique that 30% of patients have poor long-term outcomes is aimed at traditional treatment in general, not the therapy being discussed (which, again, is not Anderson's CLS). 2601:602:9C00:BE00:98B:CE55:E1AE:C674 (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - I was coming here to say the same thing. The criticism is not relevant to this article. Given that between your post and my post, four years have elapsed with no comment, I'm going to remove the criticism entirely, because it is both poorly written and not relevant to this specific article. Stevemidgley (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]