Talk:Cheese & Crack Snack Shop/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 17:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 16:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Cheese. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 16:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

& Crack! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Article has a reference section. No bare URLs spotted.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig detects a 7.4% similarity, so copyright violations are unlikely.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is stable. No edit wars have occurred in the past week.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The restaurant logo is tagged with the correct copyright status, and a sufficient fair use rationale for the image is provided.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	The logo, the only image in the article, is relevant to the article's topic.
	7. Overall assessment.

Before we begin

• For some reason (I'm guessing it's because of the ampersand in the title), Earwig doesn't let you view the copyright report of this article directly, so I'll just put a link to it here.

Lead

• No obvious errors here.

Description

• TBD.