Talk:Charity evaluator
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charity evaluator redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of Charity watchdog was merged into Charity evaluator on 28 March 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the Charity evaluator page were merged into Charity assessment and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Central Asia Institute
[edit]The dispute between GiveWell and the other evaluators only presents one side. Did the other side respond?Lrieber (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)