Talk:California Republic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California Republic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

California Republic was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 14, 2008, June 14, 2009, June 14, 2010, June 14, 2014, June 14, 2016, June 14, 2018, June 14, 2021, and June 14, 2023.

California: San Francisco Bay Area High‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

United States: Old West High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Mid-importance).

Map is misleading

Why is the map of modern-day California included in this article? The Bear Flaggers did not have any territorial control outside Sonoma, nor they represented the majority of Californians. Besides, the limits of California at that time were different from the current limits, as the border between Mexican California and British Oregon had not been clearly established, and the states of Nevada and Arizona had not yet been created. Besides, the limit between modern-day Mexico and modern-day California was not established either. For the same reason, the area in the infobox is misleading too, as it corresponds to modern-day California.

That's a very good point. The Bear Flaggers were able to capture Sonoma, San Fransisco, and Sacramento, but were absorbed into the California Battalion before the march south. Although, the point can be made that the Battalion was the bear flaggers since it was as much Ide's men as it was Fremont's. Does everyone think the map should be replaced or simply removed? -DevinCook (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ise never actually commanded a unit; the map is not accurate or useful.Rjensen (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed map & area. Feel free to add if you can find a more accurate map of the California limits & area as of 1846.

The currently used map is worse, IMO. It apparently shows the whole old Mexican province of Alta California, including Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and most of Utah. The Bear Republic never remotely controlled anything more than a tiny portion of this territory -- just Sonoma and Sutter's Mill. To show it is to provide an absurdly aggrandized version of Californian history. In reality, the Bear Republic was a short-lived rebellion by obscure settlers in a remote part of California that got swept up in the American conquest. Costik (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The former one was bad, and the current one is bad too. Sadly, I have never seen what I would consider to be an accurate map devoted to this topic. Jeff in CA (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling?

I just wanted to verify that this is correct: "Here the sheet was folded and worn in-two, and no more is found". Is it "worn in-two" or "torn in-two"? 42engineer (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I confirmed that the quoted text at the source is "worn in two."Jeff in CA (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051001054356/http://www.sfmuseum.org:80/hist6/fremont.html to http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist6/fremont.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonoma take over

Frémont had signed up American immigrants at Sutter's Fort and then this voluntary army took over Sonoma. Frémont's army was involved in the capture of Sonoma. This was Frémont's military gesture to the rebel Californians that the United States supported thier Bear Flag Revolt. Cmguy777 (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Californians and the Military Captain John Charles Fremont and the Bear Flag Revolt Cmguy777 (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The referenced web page implies at the bottom that it used Walker as its source. Walker's work is actually a major source of material for this article. The author of the web page has taken liberty with a few assumptions that are not straightforwardly or entirely supported in the Walker text, including the statements above, which are taken from that web page.Jeff in CA (talk) 23:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Coords

@Jeff in CA, I don't understand your revert or edit summary. This article is about a large region, not a specific city yet you quote a guideline about a city. Not to mention there is no indication of what "historical norms" would apply in this case. WP:COORDPREC says precision should be approximately one-tenth the size of the object. Seconds should not be used here. If the coords were for a specific city (i.e. the capital), they should be in the infobox and even then seconds are too precise. (note that in this case, the infobox says there was NO capital in a comment). @Deor, do you have a comment? MB 16:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link Redirected to Indonesian Gambling Site

The link for the citation of "A Sketch of the Life of William B Ide" Redirects to an Indonesian gambling page and not the referenced source. I believe this is likely someone attempting to troll the wiki article or scam unsuspecting readers. Please verify and correct. KennyKC (talk) 22:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I repaired the link with the archived website at archive.org.Jeff in CA (talk) 00:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was no government

User ErickTheMerrick (talk | contribs) and others are attempting to add a "form of government" entry to the infobox. This debate was settled years ago, and the article text makes it clear that there was never a "Republic of California" government, so there was never any form of government. WCCasey (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCCasey is totally correct.Jeff in CA (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This finished 6 days ago? Why are you just now making a talk page, I'm not gonna add anything anymore ErickTheMerrick (talk) 07:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]