Talk:ACCC
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
ACCC
[edit]As far as i can see there is no page on the subject of ACCC (australian competition and consumer Commission) please create one as it has a lot of interesting information connected with it. 60.231.37.194 (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes there is. It can be found at Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 26 July 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that ACCC be renamed and moved to ACCC (disambiguation). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
ACCC → ACCC (disambiguation) – The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is colloquially known as the ACCC within its home country. So I propose that a redirect should be created from ACCC to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Any suggestions for other names that this or the Australian and Competition and Consumer Commission article could use would be greatly appreciated. The article for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is much more frequently viewed than this disambiguation page with entries that may not be relevant to most people looking for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's article currently has a very difficult to type name with too many letters and must be shortened. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC) Updated at 06:46, 26 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. CoconutOctopus talk 09:57, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission does not get the majority of pageviews. No primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- According to that page views source, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's article does actually receive the most views that I can see with the blue line. Doesn't matter if you change any of the settings, the chart still shows Australian Competition and Consumer Commission at the top in most instances. Qwerty123M (talk) 07:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per the nomination. the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission does get more page views then anything else listed on the disambiguation page, per 162 etc.'s pageviews link although not by much but almost all of the outgoing traffic from the DAB page goes to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission page per wikinav. Seems like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (at least to me, I am Australian though). – MrAussieGuy (Talk) 06:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC) [Edited]– MrAussieGuy (Talk) 07:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The pageview analyses linked to above by both Qwerty123M and 162 show that Australian Competition and Consumer Commission gets more pageviews than both the disamb page and every article listed on the disamb page. TarnishedPathtalk 08:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The two "Support" votes above are misreading WP:PT1: "A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." While Australian Competition and Consumer Commission gets the most views of any article, it only gets about 35% of the clicks vs. the rest of the field. It is therefore not primary per pageviews. 162 etc. (talk) 16:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per 162. The Australian topic is not dominant. — BarrelProof (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- The pageviews between it and the DAB page suggest that it is. TarnishedPathtalk 02:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think that comparison is particularly useful. People tend to not navigate to disambiguation pages a lot in general. The more relevant question is what people are looking for when they look for information about "ACCC". But I'll grant you that WikiNav data looks favourable to the Australian topic, AFAICT. But I don't really understand what "Percentage of Views" = 1.15 means, and I'm not very experienced with WikiNav. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Which one is? Qwerty123M (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand the question. Was that a reply to TarnishedPath? — BarrelProof (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- BarrelProof isn't required to answer that to explain their point. I'm reading their comment as a claim there is no primary. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- No sorry, I was asking you if there is a primary topic than you can see from data such as page views. I just want to know why you think this way but I think that I probably shouldn't comment like this on the same proposal. Qwerty123M (talk) 22:57, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- As I said, WikiNav data looks favourable to the Australian topic, AFAICT, but according to pageview data pointed out by 162, it appears to get only about 1/3 of the total page views of the relevant subjects. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:18, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- The pageviews between it and the DAB page suggest that it is. TarnishedPathtalk 02:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:32, 28 July 2025 (UTC)