This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
I love a nice EFSA review as much as everyone else, but 2009 might be stretching it.
Regarding the issue of whether human digestion produces bBCM7, the Boutrou et al (2013) study cited by Brooke-Taylor et al. (2017) doi:10.3945/an.116.013953 looks promising enough. They use peptide sequencing to show that BCM7 really is there with none of the "immunoreactive" bull.
Regarding the issue of any direct disease link, nothing direct yet, at least going by the reference list of PMC8345738, whose authors obviously want to find the strongest human proof for the BCM7-harmful theory.
Regarding GI discomfort, the PMC article from above does cite two Chinese ClinicalTrials.gov-registered RCTs comparing regular to A2 milk. They have been cited in one 2017 systematic review, PMID28916574, which still admits that more human trials are needed. PMID30722004 (2019), which uses more trials, is able to provide "moderate certainty for adverse digestive health effects". There are newer, unreviewed RCTs being continuously done, with two recent ones being PMID38957588 and PMID40338897.