Talk:3D printed prosthesis

Article Review

This article does a great job at providing facts and using a neutral tone to describe 3d printing prosthetics. Areas for improvement could be: add a title, make leading section a more descriptive overview of the article, and fixing grammar. It may be helpful to add another section to more fully cover the field of 3d printing prosthetics, if that is relevant. Your use of images was really helpful and the article was visually pleasing, two aspects that I need to adjust on my own article! Thanks for sharing this draft! KFKdot87 (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Great Job, Here is my feedback:

What does the article (or section) do well?

The background is very interesting and engaging, details are clear and useful to the topic without feeling like forced background information. The Paragraphs in 3D Designing are all clear individual ideas The graphics are very useful overall

What changes would you suggest overall?

Devise -> Device Spending more time comparing 3D Printed prosthesis to standard prosthesis might provide a clearer image of why this option is important. On a sentence structure note, these sentences are hard to read or grammatically incorrect: “The first 3D printed prosthetic was designed in 2011 after a carpentry accident caused for Richard Van As to lose two fingers.” “some processes like SLA require the for the curing of the part, others like FDM require light clean up.” “3D printings rapid prototyping allows for this to be better honed in ensuring a better fit.”

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution?

I would consider how each section connects. Right now, the “through-line” of writing is not too clear. The information and topics covered are great, but reordering or relabeling might make this article a more cohesive package.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!

The use of an anecdote in the background gave a clear setting of the technological scene without being too factual and boring. I want to try and provide a more engaging beginning as opposed to my current brief intro and immediate information sharing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ-Marks-46 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]