Talk:2025 EuroLeague Final Four

A news item involving 2025 EuroLeague Final Four was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 May 2025.

Wikipedia

2025 EuroLeague Final Four is currently a Other sports good article nominee. Nominated by H-Hurry (talk) at 20:31, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Basketball tournament in Abu Dhabi

Basketball

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inclusion of game and player statistics

Thanks to @Left guide, the article has been expanded nicely with summaries and background of the games@Left guide. However, the game and player statistics were removed from the article. As this is valuable information that is on Wikipedia for all other Final Four tournaments and major tournaments, I added it to the article. What is the consensus on the inclusion of these types of statistics? H-Hurry (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@H-Hurry: Hi there, thanks for the recognition and for all of your work on the page too. For some background, the article was recently nominated to appear on the "In the news" section of the main page. My reason for having removed those tables was to get the article in a condition appropriate to post there, where consensus is that narrative prose with reliable sources is of utmost importance, and tables shouldn't be excessive. However, now that the prose has been fleshed out, I think those player stats tables are more reasonable as a supplement, and I no longer have objections to them being restored. By any chance, would you be interested in helping to get this nominated as a good article in the near future? If so, I think we're within striking distance. Left guide (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, the quality of this article has become very high compared to other years as well, and this sets a nice standard. I nominated the article. H-Hurry (talk) 20:32, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]