Talk:2023 Little Rock tornado
Appearance
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on April 5, 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from 2023 Little Rock tornado appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Walnut Valley, the neighborhood most affected by the 2023 Little Rock tornado (damage pictured), reported theft and illegal dumping during rebuilding efforts?
- ALT1: ... that the 2023 Little Rock tornado (damage pictured) was cited as a reason for increased insurance prices across Arkansas, with insurers reporting a loss ratio of 144% in the state that year? Source: https://www.kark.com/news/local-news/arkansans-feel-impact-of-increased-insurance-rates/ and https://www.5newsonline.com/article/news/local/arkansas-homeowners-face-soaring-insurance-rates-2024/527-b48151dd-f201-4a67-b26c-0ab40468e062
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alexey Davydov
- Comment: This article has a complex history; first created by a weather community regular as a copy-paste from the outbreak article in draftspace, then further copy-paste edited and moved to mainspace by sockpuppets, before being the subject of a four-times-relisted-yet-no-consensus AFD, then draftified and deleted. However, the article in its current state has no input from sockpuppet accounts and is the first earnest incarnation of this article.
Created by Departure– (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Departure– (talk) 19:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC).
- Beginning review. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 17:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Mgreason: It's been four days, have you finished your review? Departure– (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go. The article was recently created and has no copyright issues picked up by Earwig. QPQ already done. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 15:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Total Cost
[edit]Is the source the final estimate cost of the tornado? If so it is severely under cost Colin777724 (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Expand tornado summary
[edit]The tornado summary section here is shorter than the tornado's section on the maon article, so please the tornado summary section of this article. 2600:1014:B126:6E72:0:53:2144:EE01 (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- C-Class Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- Low-importance Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- WikiProject Severe weather articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Arkansas articles
- Mid-importance Arkansas articles
- WikiProject Arkansas articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles