Talk:2019 NFC Divisional playoff game (Seattle–Green Bay)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 07:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Lead

"The game is an important part of the Packers–Seahawks rivalry." Doesn't explain why so it comes off somewhat jarring as the final line of the lead.

I reworded slightly, but jarring or not, I'm just trying to say that this game is part of the rivalry. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Background

Green Bay Packers should be listed by the full name and linked on their first mention for consistancy

Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Game Summary

"The Packers–Seahawks rivalry was discussed" what about it was discussed?

I added "growing". « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"The loss contributed to the Seahawks's losing streak at Lambeau Field to nine games;" I dont think "to nine games" is grammatically correct

Reworded. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

May be worth mentioning the viewing figures of the game they are avalible here and here] are the ones for the championship game.

I am not especially familiar with TV viewership, and neither source really provides context around the numbers. No records set, nothing extremely unusual. Don't want to just drop in a random sentence. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Misc

Images have alt text

Page is stable

Earwig flags nothing

Citation formating consistent with other Packers pages.

Overall

@Gonzo fan2007: that's what I found ping me when done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you OlifanofmrTennant! All responded to. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.