This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
1858 Bradford sweets poisoning is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Apparently the word refers to a) the candies, b) the practice of making the candies, and c) the place where the candies are made, stored, and sold. So the answer to "is it singular or plural" is.... "yes". You can hire me to work at your confectionary, where you can teach me confectionary, so that I can make confectionary. DS (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Graham, I think it's one of those words that can be singular or plural, depending on the use. Just looking at this, "The noun confectionery can be countable or uncountable. In more general, commonly used, contexts, the plural form will also be confectionery. However, in more specific contexts, the plural form can also be confectioneries e.g. in reference to various types of confectioneries or a collection of confectioneries." Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Graham Beards As well, the British people use plurals in some places where North Americans would not. For example, what we Canadians call Math, the British call Maths. I believe Maths is actually a more correct contraction of the word Mathematics, but it sounds very strange to people like me who have always heard it called Math. 174.3.216.108 (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This sentence appears twice: "The adulteration of food had been practised in Britain since before the Middle Ages, but from 1800, with increasing urbanisation and the rise in shop-purchased food, adulterants became a growing problem." Is this an error? It reads like one. YAOMTC (talk) 06:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, it’s not. It appears in the lead (which summarises the article) and the body where there is context, background snd citations. - SchroCat (talk) 07:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the 2nd last sentence of the 3rd paragraph (not including the collapsable Quick Facts), the use of the phrase "breaching it" makes no sense at all. Somebody should fix it. I would if I felt confident enough.
As well, much stronger cautions about using neologisms should be added to the guidelines for writing articles, because Wikipedia is overflowing with trendy words and phrases that were made up on the spot by people who don't know how to write properly. 174.3.216.108 (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]