Jump to content

Operation Forager logistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operating a forklift truck at the Navy supply depot on Guam

Operation Forager, the U.S. invasion of the Mariana Islands during World War II, involved the movement and support of a fleet of ships and two corps of ground troops over extremely long distances. A crucial problem was the provision of sufficient shipping to maintain the fleet and the force was a critical problem. In the event, a shortages of ships and cargo space forced units to leave some vehicles and unit equipment behind, and some units had to travel on separate ships from their unit equipment. Unloading was facilitated by the use of wooden pallets, but not all cargo ships had the space of equipment to accommodate them, and on Guam the reef prevented landing craft directly accessing the beach and required stores to be transferred to DUKWs or LVTs on the reef.

Two dozen replenishment oilers were on hand to enable the fleet to refuel and sea. For the first time in the Central Pacific Area, the Japanese had targeted oilers. With the fleet at sea for over four months, many stores aboard ran low. These were replenished by general stores issue ships that carried 5,000 different items, such as toilet paper. The Battle of the Philippine Sea and staunch Japanese resistance ashore on Saipan and later Guam resulted in a longer campaign than anticipated, with increased calls for naval gunfire support, and consequently prodigious ammunition consumption. Most resupply ships were not vertically loaded, which made retrieving the most urgently needed ammunition more problematic. Ammunition ships were called forward to replenish the fleet off Saipan while the battle still raged on shore, a risky action, as Japanese air attacks occurred almost every day.

After the battle, the Mariana Islands were developed into a major naval and air base. Hospitals on the islands received wounded from the Battle of Iwo Jima and the Battle of Okinawa. Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers were based on the islands, and participated in the campaign of air raids on Japan, including the bombing of Tokyo on 10 March 1945 and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Background

[edit]

Operation Forager, the U.S. invasion of the Mariana Islands during World War II, involved the movement and support of a fleet of ships and two corps of ground troops over a distance of 3,200 miles (5,100 km).[1] The islands were mountainous, with a total land area of about 72 square miles (19,000 ha). This meant that, unlike the small, low-lying coral atolls that had been captured in the Gilbert and Marshall Islands campaign, there was little prospect of the islands being overrun quickly, and prolonged fighting was a possibility. Accordingly, the assault troops carried 32 days' supply of rations, 30 days worth of medical supplies, 20 days' supply of fuel,[2] and seven units of fire for all weapons, except anti-aircraft guns, for which fifteen units of fire were taken.[3]

[edit]

Shipping

[edit]

The provision of shipping to maintain the force was a critical problem. A staff study estimated that this would require 120 cargo ships and 58 troop transports, of which only 18 and 22 respectively were on hand in April 1944.[4] For the invasion of Saipan, 110 transport vessels were available: 37 troop transports attack transports (APA) and troop transports (AP); 11 attack cargo ships (AKA) and cargo ships (AK); 5 dock landing ships (LSD); 47 tank landing ships (LST); and 10 high-speed transports (APD). They carried 74,986.6 measurement tons (84,935.4 m3) of cargo. Staging areas were widely separated; the 2nd Marine Division loaded at Hilo on the island of Hawaii; the 4th Marine Division at Kahului on Maui, and the 27th Infantry Division on Oahu.[5]

Combat loading, in which most urgently required cargo was stowed in ships' holds so as to be immediately accessible, was favoured for ships carrying the assault troops, but was not always possible due to the shortage of shipping. Some units of the V Amphibious Corps troops and the XXIV Corps Artillery found themselves travelling separately from their unit equipment, a highly undesirable scenario in a combat zone, but fully combat loading the entire force would have meant leaving up to 35 percent of their cargo behind.[5] Even then, there was insufficient cargo space, and the V Amphibious Corps was forced to make cuts to unit equipment. This fell most heavily on transport, which was bulky. Only 94 percent of ambulances, 83 percent of trucks, 71 percent of trailers and 75 percent of tractors could be taken to Saipan.[6]

Unloading ammunition on pallets from an LCM

This was partially offset by the allocation of 185 DUKWs. Each division had a DUKW company: the 1st Amphibian Truck Company for the 2nd Marine Division, the 2nd 1st Amphibian Truck Company for the 4th Marine Division, and a provisional amphibian truck company for the 27th Infantry Division. In addition, the 477th Amphibian Truck Company was attached to the XXIV Corps Artillery.[6] For Guam, the 3rd Marine Division and the 1st Provisional Marine Brigade shared the III Amphibious Corps Motor Transport Battalion, with its Company C assigned to the brigade.[7] When a typhoon struck on 29 July, an LST broached and LVTs and landing craft were unable to operate, but the DUKWs proved more seaworthy, and they were able to continue delivering supplies.[8]

The V Amphibious Corps Headquarters ordered that 25 to 50 percent of all supplies and two to five units of fire of ammunition be on pallets. This order was embraced by the 27th Infantry Division, which put between 80 and 90 percent of its supplies on pallets, but the 2nd and 4th Marine Divisions were less enthusiastic about the idea. The former put no more than 25 percent of its supplies on pallets, and the latter only palletized 10 to 15 percent.[9][2] The 3rd Marine Division and the 1st Provisional Marine Brigade did not put any of their supplies on pallets at all, but the 77th Infantry Division complied with the directive and constructied more than 5,000 4-by-6-foot (1.2 by 1.8 m) wooden pallets, although about 1,000 pallet loads were broken up because they did not fit into the available cargo space or because a ship lacked the equipment to handle pallets.[10][11]

On the recommendation of the Commanding General, Expeditionary Troops (Task Force 56), Lieutenant General Holland M. Smith, resupply ships sailing from the United States were "block loaded", with a mixture of common stores. This proved to not only be inefficient in the use of cargo space, but presented difficulty in unloading, as each type of supplies had to be completely unloaded before the next could be accessed. In his evalaution, the Joint Expeditionary Force (Task Force 51) commander, Vice Admiral recommended that the Navy revert to commodity loading, where each ship carried a particular type of supplies, which facilitated selective unloading of stores.[2]

Food and water

[edit]

The Southern Attack Force was mounted from the South Pacific Area, so most of its initial complement of fresh provisions from New Zealand, while those for the Northern Attack Force, destined for the assaults on Saipan and Tinian, came from Hawaii and the West Coast of the United States. Once the operation was under way, resupply was from the West Coast though the bases in Hawaii, and on Majuro, Kwajalein and Eniwetok. Rations for Army units were drawn for Army stocks while those for the Navy and Marine Corps came from Navy stocks.[12] Ships returning from the forward areas to supply points transferred excess stores not required for the return voyage to other vessels.[13]

Marines load supplies aboard two LSTs in preparation for the assault on Tinian

The supply of fresh produce depended on the availability of reefer ships, cargo ships with refrigerated holds. These were specially designed to carry a mixture of fresh and dry provisions, and to permit selective of a balanced cargo so that one ship after another could be revictualated without having to unload the reefer's cargo and re-stow it. The Service Force had nine reefers, as the majority of the Navy's reefers were serving with the Atlantic Fleet. The Pacific Fleet's reefers were therefore supplemented by ships of the War Shipping Administration. These were large 5,000-gross-register-ton (14,000 m3) vessels with merchant marine crews that could carry up to 348,000 feet (106,000 m) of refrigerated produce, enough for thirty days' supply for 90,000 men; but their holds and hatches were not organised for selective discharge, so they had to unload into warehouses, and Saipan had no such facilities until 15 August. Nonetheless, during Operation Forager, the Service Force managed to supply fresh produce to all combatant ships in five days out of six, and to the forces ashore for one day in three.[12]

Until water supplies could be secured ashore, arrangements were made for transports, LSTs and large warships to provide water to smaller vessels that lacked sufficient water storage. Water supplies ran low when these ships started to leave, and bad weather sometimes prevented resupply from those that remained.[14] The 77th Infantry Division took with it 190,000 US gallons (720,000 L) of potable water in 5-US-gallon (19 L; 4.2 imp gal) jerrycans and 55-US-gallon (210 L; 46 imp gal) drums.[15] Each shore party engineer battalion had two distillation units.[16] The division moved the six of them to Pago Bay to keep forward units in northern Guam supplied, and managed to capture the well at village of Barrigada intact, which could supply 30,000 US gallons (110,000 L) per day.[15]

With the fleet at sea for over four months, many stores aboard ran low. These were replenished by general stores issue ships that carried 5,000 different items, such as toilet paper.[12]

Fuel

[edit]
USS LST-205 beached on a reef along with two other LST during landing operations on Saipan, Marianas Islands, 21 June 1944, as men of the US Army Air Corps 804th Engineer Aviation Battalion roll floating gasoline drums from the ship to shore.

Fleet oilers were under the command of Commodore Augustus (Gus) H. Gray, the commander of Service Squadron 8. Captain Burton B. Biggs, an experienced logistics officer on Spruance's staff, directed fueling operations.[17] It was estimated that the Operation Forager would require 100,000 barrels (16,000 m3) per day, roughly the capacity of an oiler.[18] Eight task units were organized, designated Task Units 16.7.1 to 16.7.8, each of which had three oilers, escorted by at least two destroyers or destroyer escorts.[19]

The oilers were despatched to designated refueling areas, 75-by-25-mile (121 by 40 km) rectangles of open ocean; eleven were designated for Operation Forager, each named after a well-known oil company.[13] In accordance with a timetable, or occasionally when there was a special need for more fuel, ships would leave their task groups and rendezvous with the oilers to be refueled at sea.[17] Oilers returned to Eniwetok when they had less than 20,000 barrels (3,200 m3),[13] where they were refilled by commercial tankers.[19]

On 18 June, the oilers USS Saranac, Neshanic and USS Saugatuck were refueling four destroyers and destroyer escorts when they came under attack by five Japanese bombers. This was the first time that the Japanese had targeted oilers in the Central Pacific. All three oilers were hit. Saranac had eight killed and twenty-two wounded and was so badly damaged that it had to return to Eniwetok and then to San Pedro, California, for repairs. A bomb exploded among gasoline drums on Neshanic's deck, setting of a major fire that was extinguished by its damage control party. Neshanic and Saugatuck were repaired by Service Squadron 10 at Eniwetok.[17][18][20]

Ammunition

[edit]
USS New Mexico replenishes her ammunition supply prior to the invasion of Guam

Ammunition usage is less predictable than food or fuel, but orders had to be placed with the depots months in advance. Fleet and aircraft ammunition was then brought forward by the ammunition ships USS Lassen, Rainier, Shasta, Mauna Loa, Mazama and Sangay, which replenished warships at Eniwetok lagoon from 15 June on.[13][3] Because the Pacific Ocean Area had only six ammunition ships, the LSD USS Ashland was pressed into service to deliver ammunition, as were twenty-six LSTs. Six Victory ships were chartered from the War Shipping Administration to haul ammunition, the first of which arrived off Saipan on 30 June. They were loaded on the West Coast with a mix of ammunition in such a way as to permit optional discharge, whereby any particular ammunition could be retrieved without having to remove layers of unwanted other types. This was the first time this had been tried with merchant ships, and it was risky because there was a shortage of crewmen trained in the proper handing of explosives.[3]

The risk was very real. Sixteen LSTs were designated to each carry 750 rounds of 5-inch/38-caliber gun anti-aircraft ammunition and ten more were designated to each carry 270 4.5-inch rockets, 6,000 rounds of 40 mm and 15,000 rounds of 20 mm anti-aircraft ammunition. It had been intended to deploy three Landing Craft, Tank, (LCTs) as gunships armed with M2 4.2-inch mortar and 2,500 rounds, but two of them were lost when they slid off the decks of their LSTs in rough weather on the night of 14–15 May during a rehearsal of the landing operation. Turner decided to abandon the LCT gunship project and transfer the mortar ammunition to LSTs. On 21 May, while mortar rounds were being transferred to LST-353 by the African-American 29th Chemical Decontamination Company, who had no training in handling ammunition, a mortar round exploded. In the resulting fires and secondary explosions, six LSTs and three LCTs were lost. The West Loch Disaster cost the lives of at least 163 men; another 396 were injured. Six LSTs originally earmarked to carry the garrison troops were substituted for the ones lost. Loading and embarkation was delayed by only one day, with the LSTs departing Pearl Harbor on 25 May, and making up the lost day en route.[21][22][23]

The Battle of the Philippine Sea and staunch Japanese resistance ashore resulted in a longer campaign than anticipated, with increased calls for naval gunfire support, and consequently prodigious ammunition consumption.[3] Not long after the fighting began on Saipan, it became apparent that the supply of certain types of ammunition, notably 6-inch high capacity (HC), 5-inch anti-aircraft common (AAC) and star shell, would soon be exhausted.[24] (Out of a total of 106,110 shells (8,429.6 short tons (7,647.2 t)) fired during Operation Stevedore, the liberation of Guam, 5,039 were star shells.[25]) The higher than expected expenture of ammunition ashore was exacerbated by the early committment of the 27th Infantry Division to the fighting on Saipan, which meant that three rather than two divisions were consuming ammunition at a high rate.[2] The allocation of seven units of fire, which was based on previous campaigns in the Central Pacific, proved to be too low, and it was recommended that ten be taken in future operations.[6] This problem was not restricted to ammunition: signal units had brought twenty days' supply of batteries, but it was found that this was not enough for twenty days' combat on Saipan.[26]

Most resupply ships were not vertically loaded, which made retrieving the most urgently needed ammunition more problematic.[6] As Mazuma was loaded with the types most needed, she was called forward to replenish the fleet off Saipan while the battle still raged on shore, a risky action, as Japanese air attacks occurred almost every day.[24][3] Between 21 June and 7 July, when she returned to Eniwetok, Mazuma discharged 3,448 short tons (3,128 t) of ammunition.[27]

Aircraft

[edit]
USS Manila Bay under attack by four Japanese "Zeke" aircraft off Saipan on 23 June 1944. The deck is loaded with Republic P-47 Thunderbolt fighters for delivery to airfields on Saipan .

Replacement aircraft were brought out by four escort carriers. Two, USS Copahee and Breton, carried naval aircraft, while USS Manila Bay and Natoma Bay brought twenty-two U.S. Army Republic P-47 Thunderbolt fighters of the 19th Fighter Squadron. These were catapulted from the escort carriers on 22 June and landed on Isely Field, where they were based for the rest of the campaign.[18][28] Although the escort carriers were designed to operate no more than twenty-four aircraft, various innovation allowed them to carry many more.[19]

For Operation Forager, Copahee took on 61 aircraft: 25 fighter, 15 torpedo bombers and 21 dive bombers. She left Pearl Harbor on 3 June with the oiler group. On 14 June, she delivered four fighters and a torpedo bomber to USS Cowpens; a fighter, a torpedo bomber and three dive bombers to USS Hornet; four fighters to USS Bataan; five fighters, five torpedo bombers and seven fighters to USS Yorktown; and four fighters and two torpedo bombers to USS Belleau Wood. In exchange, Copahee received flyable duds, aircraft capable of taking off and landing, but for one reason or another not capable of combat operations. During Operation Forager, Copahee shuttled back and forth between the Marianas and Eniwetok. On 7 July, it took back captured Japanese aircraft.[29][30] Spare parts for aircraft were carried aboard the USS Fortune.[19]

Salvage

[edit]
Repair ship USS Hector

Six fleet tugs accompanied the expeditionary force for towing and fire fighting, along with two salvage vessels; two more were assigned to Service Squadron 12 for harbor clearance. Two repair ships for landing craft, the USS Egeria and Agenor accompanied the expeditionary force. Battle damage to warships was addressed by the repair ships of Service Squadron 10 at Eniwetok.[31]

Service Squadron 10 was commanded by Commodore Worrall Reed Carter, who flew his pennant from the destroyer tender USS Prairie. The squadron's ships included the repair ships USS Vestal, Ajax, Hector and Luzon; destroyer tenders USS Piedmont, Cascade and Markab; landing craft repair ship USS Egeria; floating dry docks ARD-13, ARD-15 and AFD-15; and floating workshop YR-30.[32][33]

A major salvage effort began on 21 July, when the SS Sea Flyer ran aground at Eniwetok. The ship's 1,900 long tons (1,900 t) cargo had to be unloaded before she could be refloated and tugboats could tow her clear on 28 July.[34]

Medical

[edit]
Hospital ship USS Relief

Medical supplies were carried in general stores ships. Four hospital ships participated in Operation Forager: USS Relief, USS Solace (AH-5), Bountiful and Samaritan. The transports USS Rixey, Wharton and Tryon took walking wounded who required no more than two weeks hospitalization.[31][35] Three LSTs were specially equipped as makeshift hospital ships and handled 1,549 casualties on 15 June. Bountiful and Solace arrived off Saipan on 18 June and embarked 1,099 casualties. By 20 June, Solace was full to capacity with 584 cases on board and sailed for hospitals on Guadalcanal. She return to Saipan on 3 July, and took on 562 patients by the afternoon of 5 July, when she sailed to the Russell Islands to transfer them to Fleet Hospital 110 and the Army's 222nd Station Hospital. She then sailed for Guam via Eniwetok, where she refueled, and arrived at Agana Bay on 24 July to take on a capacity of 585 cases, who were taken to Kwajalein. Relief and Samaritan took 1,355 casualties on board on 23 June. On her second voyage to Saipan, Relief embarked 685, of whom 284 were wounded Japanese.[36] Seaplanes from VH-1 performed emergency evacuation of casualties to the Marshall Islands.[31] Air evacuation from Isely Field commenced on 24 June, and 860 casualties were flown to the Marshall Islands during Operation Forager.[36]

Ship-to-shore

[edit]

Each transport division consisted of four APAs and an attack cargo ship (AKA). Each transport carried up to 1,500 troops, so a transport division could carry a regimental combat team. Three transport divisions were required to lift an infantry or marine division, with another four APAs and four AKAs for corps troops.[4] The landings in the Marianas required landing vehicles, tracked, (LVTs) to carry troops across the reefs.[37] Their value had been demonstrated in the Battle of Tarawa.[38] They were carried in Landing Ships, Tank, (LSTs). The LVTs were able to cross the reef and disembark their troops on the beach.[37]

Shore Party on Blue Beach 1, Saipan

Only the first waves of infantry were in LVTs; succeeding waves arrived in assault transports and were loaded onto landing craft, vehicle, personnel, (LCVPs) carried by the assault transports. The LCVPs carried the troops to the reef, where they transferred to LVTs returning after dropping off earlier waves.[37] Tanks were carried in LSDs. Each LSD carried twenty medium tanks, loaded in a LCT and fourteen Landing Craft, Mechanized, (LCMs).[39] Eight LSTs were required to carry the marines' divisional artillery for the assault on Saipan.[4] The 105 mm howitzers were carried in DUKWs (amphibious trucks) while LVTs brought the 75 mm pack howitzers from the reefs. Once the situation ashore stabilized, LSTs could nose up to the reef and discharge vehicles and supplies directly onto it.[39] Six LSTs carried four pontoon barges each, six carried two pontoon causeway section, and thirty-carried an LCT.[4]

A DUKW drives down the ramp of USS LST-220 during re-supply operations on Guam

While the troops could move inland under their own power, supplies could not, and had to remain on the beach until the shore party could sort them and transport became available to move them to inland dumps. Supplies therefore piled up on the beaches. On Saipan, hydrographic conditions were not conducive to a steady flow of supplies over the beaches. The beaches were under mortar and artillery fire for the first four days, which created further disruption as unloading activity was suspended while the shore parties sought cover. The appearance of the Japanese fleet caused the transports to move out to sea on each of the first three nights, and they left the area completely on the next five days and nights while they awaited the outcome of the Battle of the Philippine Sea.[40]

Naval beach parties marked the beaches and supervised the unloading of stores from the ships and their movement to the shoreline. These were under the control of the naval beachmasters. Each assault division had a transport group beachmaster. In turn, each transport group beachmaster had two transport division beachmasters, one for each assault regiment. Each division had a shore party that worked in cooperation with the beachmasters. Marine divisions were authorized to have a shore party of 98 officers and 2,781 enlisted men; that of the 2nd Marine Division was built around its pioneer battalion, whereas that of the 4th Marine Division was built around the 121st Naval Construction Battalion. Each regiment of the 27th Infantry Division had an engineer battalion that functioned as its shore party: the 34th, 152th and 1341st Engineer Combat battalions of the 1165th Engineer Combat Group.[40]

Floating refueling point off Tinian

On Saipan, supplies intended for the 2nd Marine Division were often dumped on the 4th Marines Division's beaches, but the situation went from bad to worse when the 27th Infantry Division was called forward from floating reserve. Plans had not been made for it to land in the 4th Marine Division area, and the beachmaster would not agree to land all of its supplies on a single beach. As a result, its supplies were landed on several beaches. When the transports retired on 18 June, the division was left with four days' supply of small arms ammunition and just 600 rounds of 155 mm howitzer and 1,200 rounds of 105 mm ammunition per battalion. Only three of its 2½-ton 6×6 trucks had been landed, although it still had forty-nine DUKWs. The 27th Infantry Division's supplies were not fully unloaded until 27 June. The handling of its supplies was greatly eased, though, by the large proportion that arrived on pallets.[41]

The 77th Infantry Division's experience with pallets was less successful, because the beaches on Guam lay beyond a coral reef. Cranes were required to load the pallets, and these were not always available, so many pallet loads were broken up so the supplies could be manhandled to transfer points. Landing craft and landing ships could not come closer than the reef, several hundred yards from the beach, and the loss of twenty-four LVTs to Japanese fire in the initial assault was sorely felt. A layer of silt on the shore side of the reef caused DUKWs and LVTs to become bogged, slowing things down. Rubber raft causeways and ships' life rafts were used as expedients to get the needed supplies ashore.[10][42] Cranes were used to shift supplies in cargo nets from landing craft to the LVTs and DUKWs. Unlike the northern beaches on Guam, where some cranes were set up on the reef, all the cranes on the southern beaches had to be mounted on barges, with cargo transferred in deep water. The Navy assisted the forces ashore by continuing unloading operations through the night under lights with the aid of the shore parties' 5 KW generators.[43][44][45]

Supplies are unloaded over a pontoon causeway and barge in Charan Kanoa Harbor

About one-fifth of the total strength of III Amphibious Corps was engaged in unloading activities. The 1st Provisional Marine Brigade had 1,070 men on board ship and 1,800 on the reef and beaches engaged in unloading work. The 77th Infantry Division, with three battalions of shore party engineers and 270 garrison troops with low landing priorities, had 583 soldiers unloading ships and 1,828 working ashore.[46] Potential supply dump locations identified beforehand from aerial photos were often found to be rice paddies, which were unsuitable.[47]

To provide the needs of units ashore, the Marines formed two new units, the 5th and 7th Field Depots. The former supported the III Amphibious Corps on Guam and the latter the V Amphibious Corps on Saipan and Tinian. They repaired weapons and equipment, carried out salvage, and sorted, stockpiled and issued stores and ammunition.[2]

Base development

[edit]

Saipan

[edit]

The Seabees of the 18th and 121st Naval Construction Battalions with elements of 67th and 92nd Naval Construction Battalions landed on Saipan with the assault troops on 15 June 1944. Aslito Airfield was captured on 18 June. Holes were filled with crushed coral and the 4,500-foot (1,400 m) runway resurfaced with marston mat. By 21 June, it was widened to 200 feet (61 m). The Japanese gasoline storage blockhouses were still usable and were restocked by the Seabees. The Army's 804th Engineer Aviation Battalion then took over construction.[48] The Army's 19th Fighter Squadron arrived on 22 June, followed over the next two days by the 73rd Fighter Squadron and a detachment of seven Northrop P-61 Black Widow night fighters from the 6th Night Fighter Squadron.[28] The airfield was renamed Isley Field in honor of Commander Robert H. Isely, a naval aviator killed in the preliminary air strikes on the island.[49][50]

Isely Field in 1945

The Army's 1176th Construction Group, under the command of Colonel Brendan A. Burns, who doubled as garrison engineer,[51] undertook the construction of a new 8,500-foot (2,600 m) asphalt-surfaced runway at Isley Field for Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers. The new runway ran across the existing one, so in order not to interrupt fighter operations, work proceeded on the two ends of the runway, leaving the existing airstrip untouched. The topsoil was not deep, and underneath was coral rock that had to be removed by blasting, for which the 804th Engineer Aviation Battalion used about five tons of dynamite each day. Asphalt was produced at plants located near the field, and coral rock came from a quarry 2 miles (3.2 km) away. The engineers laid down a coral base 12 to 18 inches (30 to 46 cm) deep.[52][53]

A second strip, was begun to the northwest, but the difficulty encountered was so great that it was developed as a shorter, medium bomber strip only. Another B-29 runway was constructed at Isley, parallel to the first.[51] The first B-29 of the 73rd Bombardment Wing landed on Saipan on 12 October, before work on the first runway was completed. The second was in use by 15 December, but works at Isley were not completed until April 1945.[54]

On 21 June, Seabees of the 121st Naval Construction Battalion began to repair the shell-damaged railroad tracks that ran from Charan Kanoa to Aslito Airfield and by 25 June supply trains were running. Other tracks in the area were also repaired. A diesel and three steam locomotives were repaired and put to use, along with a hundred flatcars. The railway, operated by the 1398th Engineer Construction Battalion, was carrying 350 ton-miles (510 tkm) per day by July. The tracks were subsequently ripped up and a road built on the right of way. Two of the locomotives were used to sterilise garbage cans.[48][55] After the capture of Tanapag Harbor, the port was rehabilitated. The Army was responsible for building piers and cargo storage areas, while the Navy removed sunken vessels and other debris offshore and dredged the harbor.[56]

On September 13, 1944, the Seabees were given the order to turn Saipan into a major advance naval base. The 39th, 17th, 101st, 117th, 595th and 614th Construction Battalions and the 31st Special Battalion joined in the construction. To keep boats and LVTs on the flighting front there was a great demand for bases that could repair and restock boats in remote ports.[57] Hospitals were initially in tents, but over time these were replaced by Quonset huts, and water, sewage, air-conditioning, asphalt roads and concrete sidewalks were added.[56] The 17th Naval Construction Battalion built a 400-bed hospital in early 1945, which received casualties from the Battle of Iwo Jima and the Okinawa campaign. Army hospitals built on Saipan included the 3,000-bed 5th Convalescent Hospital and the 2,000-bed 148th General Hospital, both of which were completed in April 1945, the 39th General Hospital and the 176th and 369th Station Hospitals.[58][59]

Tinian

[edit]

Responsibility for the transformation of Tinian into a base for B-29 bombers was assigned to the 6th Naval Construction Brigade, under Halloran's command. For this work his brigade had the 29th and 30th Naval Construction Regiments; a third regiment, the 49th Naval Construction Regiment, arrived in March 1945.[60] Two air bases were constructed, North Field and West Field. These were on the site of the existing Japanese fields at Ushi Point and Gurguan Point respectively, but they had to be lengthened to 8,500 feet (2,600 m) and widened to 500 feet (150 m) to handle the B-29s. This task would have been easier if the plateau had been more than 7,000 feet (2,100 m) wide. As it was, large amounts of fill were required.[61]

Seabee Vance Shoemate directs truckers to unload coral for B-29 bomber runway on Tinian. In the background is a fleet of trucks awaiting their turn for leads from the scoop shovel.

When work was completed on 5 May 1945, North Field had four parallel 8,500-foot (2,600 m) runways, with 8 miles (13 km) of taxiways, 265 hardstands, 173 Quonset huts and 92 other buildings. Its construction involved 2,109,800 cubic yards (1,613,100 m3) of excavations and 4,789,400 cubic yards (3,661,800 m3) of fill. West Field had two B-29 runways, 53,000 feet (16,000 m) of taxiways, 220 hardstands and 251 administration, maintenance and repair buildings. The adjacent base for naval aircraft had 16,000 feet (4,900 m) of taxiways, 70 hardstands, 345 Quonset huts, 33 administration, maintenance and repair buildings, and a 75-foot (23 m) tall control tower.[61]

Initially, fuel had to be supplied in drums. Later, aviation gasoline was drawn from a barge anchored in Tinian Harbor. The fuel storage and distribution system was completed by 8 March 1945. This included storage tanks for 14,000 US barrels (1,700,000 L) of diesel oil, 20,000 US barrels (2,400,000 L) of motor gasoline and 165,000 US barrels (19,700,000 L) of aviation gasoline. Fuel was pumped over a submarine pipeline from an oil tanker moored north of Tinian Harbor and distributed over 86,000 feet (26,000 m) of pipeline.[62] Work on the harbor included dredging operations and the construction of a breakwater and quays for Liberty ships. Until it was completed in March 1945, cargo was brought ashore by LCMs and LCTs.[63]

North Field became operational in February 1945 and West Field the following month.[64] The 313th Bombardment Wing arrived from the United States in December 1944 and was based at North Field. The 58th Bombardment Wing arrived from the China-Burma-India Theater in March 1945 and was based at West Field. A third formation, the 509th Composite Group arrived in May 1945 and moved to North Field, where it took over an area that had been specially constructed for it. Thus, two of the five bombardment wings of the Twentieth Air Force were based on Tinian.[65][66] These formations participated in the campaign of air raids on Japan, including the bombing of Tokyo on 10 March 1945,[67] and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 August 1945.[68]

Guam

[edit]

In the months after the battle, Guam was transformed into a major supply, naval and air base, and eventually became the location of Nimitz's headquarters.[69] For the purpose, the 5th Naval Construction Brigade was activated at Pearl Harbor on 1 June 1944 under the command of Captain William O. Hiltabidle Jr., with the 26th, 27th and 28th (Special) Naval Construction Regiments assigned. The first seabees, the 25th and 53rd Construction Battalions, 2nd and 13th Special Battalions, and Construction Battalion Maintenance Unit 515, arrived with the assault troops, and mainly performed stevedoring duties. The 5th Naval Construction Brigade staff came ashore on 23 July.[70]

Seawall under construction by Seabees of the 76th Construction Battalion at Apra Harbor. A 30-ton boulder is hauled to dumping spot.

First order of business was the development of Apra Harbor. Work commenced on a pontoon pier on Cabras Island on 5 August. This was completed on 22 August, and by October six 42-by-350-foot (13 by 107 m) piers were in operation. Between 3 and 6 October, Guam was struck by a typhoon that wrecked all the piers and severely damaged the barges that had been sunk to create a breakwater. The damage was repaired, and a new design was used to make the piers more resilient. Limestone was quarried on Cabra Island to construct a breakwater 3,260 feet (990 m) in length and 32 feet (9.8 m) in width. Development of the inner harbor involved 7,500,000 cubic feet (210,000 m3) of dredging.[71]

The Japanese-built Orote Field was rebuilt and lengthened to 5,500 feet (1,700 m) The airstrip near Agana was extended to 7,000 feet (2,100 m), with the orientation shifted slightly to avoid Mount Barrigada, and a second runway was added. The first planes landed there on 22 October. A third airstrip, north of Agana Field, became Depot and later Harmon Field. The 7,000-by-150-foot (2,134 by 46 m) was sealed with two inches of asphalt concrete and 12,000 feet (3,700 m) of taxiway was constructed. The first B-29s landed there on 24 November.[72] Two B-29 airfields, North Field and Northwest Fields, were built by army aviation engineer battalions. North Field was commissioned on 3 February 1945,[72][73] and the first B-29 raid from Guam was launched from there on 24 February.[74] A second runway was operational by April. The south runway at Northwest Field became operational on 1 June, and the north runway on 1 July.[72]

The seabees and army engineers also built the Naval Base Hospital, Fleet Hospitals 103 and 115, and the Army's 373rd Station Hospital and 204th General Hospital. Their 9,000 beds were soon used for casualties from the Battle of Iwo Jima.[75] By August 1945, 201,718 American troops were based on Guam, of which 65,095 were Army and Army Air Forces, 77,911 were Navy, and 58,712 were marines.[69]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Crowl 1960, p. 47.
  2. ^ a b c d e Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, pp. 242–243.
  3. ^ a b c d e Morison 1953, pp. 346–347.
  4. ^ a b c d Morison 1953, pp. 347–349.
  5. ^ a b Crowl 1960, pp. 47–48.
  6. ^ a b c d Crowl 1960, pp. 128–129.
  7. ^ Lodge 1954, p. 194.
  8. ^ Crowl 1960, pp. 300–301.
  9. ^ Crowl 1960, pp. 48–49.
  10. ^ a b Bruce 1944, p. 6.
  11. ^ Crowl 1960, pp. 319–320.
  12. ^ a b c Morison 1953, pp. 343–344.
  13. ^ a b c d Carter 1953, p. 139.
  14. ^ Carter 1953, p. 162.
  15. ^ a b Bruce 1944, p. 3.
  16. ^ Crowl 1960, p. 318.
  17. ^ a b c Morison 1953, p. 345.
  18. ^ a b c Wildenberg 1996, pp. 183–185.
  19. ^ a b c d Carter 1953, p. 140.
  20. ^ "Saranac IV (AO-74)". Naval History and Heritage Command. Retrieved 8 July 2025.
  21. ^ Dyer 1969, pp. 893–895.
  22. ^ Crowl 1960, p. 49.
  23. ^ "Navy recalls bravery at WWII's West Loch Disaster". The San Diego Union-Tribune. 19 May 2009. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  24. ^ a b Carter 1953, p. 151.
  25. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 573.
  26. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 350.
  27. ^ Carter 1953, p. 152.
  28. ^ a b Olson & Mortensen 1950, pp. 690–691.
  29. ^ Fisher 2023, pp. 153–155.
  30. ^ Carter 1953, p. 145.
  31. ^ a b c Carter 1953, p. 141.
  32. ^ Carter 1953, p. 163.
  33. ^ Morison 1953, p. 420.
  34. ^ Carter 1953, p. 167.
  35. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 502.
  36. ^ a b Carter 1953, pp. 158–160.
  37. ^ a b c Crowl 1960, p. 342.
  38. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 582.
  39. ^ a b Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, pp. 458–459.
  40. ^ a b Crowl 1960, pp. 123–124.
  41. ^ Crowl 1960, pp. 125–128.
  42. ^ Morison 1953, pp. 390–391.
  43. ^ Lodge 1954, p. 54.
  44. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 478.
  45. ^ Bruce 1944, p. 7.
  46. ^ Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 476.
  47. ^ Simmons 1987, p. 8.
  48. ^ a b Building the Navy's Bases 1947, p. 340.
  49. ^ Taylor et al. 1953, p. 515.
  50. ^ Dod 1966, p. 498.
  51. ^ a b Dod 1966, p. 511.
  52. ^ Dod 1966, pp. 498–501.
  53. ^ Green, Clinton (10 December 1944). "Our B-29 Base: An Epic Job; The story of how Saipan was remade to give a base for bombing Tokyo". The New York Times. p. 8. Retrieved 19 July 2025.
  54. ^ Taylor et al. 1953, p. 517.
  55. ^ Dod 1966, pp. 502–503.
  56. ^ a b Dod 1966, p. 501.
  57. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, p. 342.
  58. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, p. 343.
  59. ^ Condon-Rall & Cowdrey 1998, p. 236.
  60. ^ "6th Naval Construction Brigade Log: Task on Tinian" (PDF). United States Navy Seabee Museum. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 February 2024. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
  61. ^ a b Building the Navy's Bases 1947, pp. 358–362.
  62. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, p. 365.
  63. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, pp. 366–367.
  64. ^ Rottman & Gerrard 2004, p. 89.
  65. ^ Cate 1953, p. 166.
  66. ^ Taylor et al. 1953, pp. 519–525.
  67. ^ Taylor et al. 1953, pp. 614–617.
  68. ^ Taylor et al. 1953, pp. 713–725.
  69. ^ a b Shaw, Nalty & Turnbladh 1994, p. 571.
  70. ^ "5th Naval Construction Brigade - Historical Information" (PDF). Naval History and Heritage Command. Retrieved 6 July 2025.
  71. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, pp. 349–350.
  72. ^ a b c Building the Navy's Bases 1947, pp. 350–352.
  73. ^ Brown 1945, pp. 398–401.
  74. ^ Rottman 2004, p. 88.
  75. ^ Building the Navy's Bases 1947, p. 357.

References

[edit]