Draft talk:Vance Luther Boelter
Creating this as a wait-and-see
[edit]Per this discussion I think it's reasonable to think that Boelter will be notable enough for his own bio. Since sources are being collected there, it seemed reasonable to me to spin this off in Draft space. Guettarda (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Tried my best
[edit]I tried my best to make the draft more appropriate enough for Wikipedia. It's not the greatest though. 2600:1702:5225:C010:ED63:E70E:C3CE:EA9A (talk) 23:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Wow, a lot of info! More work needed.
[edit]This draft has me convinced of noteworthiness. I was surprised by the amount of information published by reliable secondary sources.
That said, it may seem painstaking, but every single claim needs to be supported by a reliable secondary source. See WP:RSP for more info.
Also, any news media links which are "live" are subject to change, so they create verifiability issues. Washington Post is one example of a source which does this--they create blog-style pages to which journalists post new info as it comes out. Hopefully that info later makes it into articles with stable links, but it might not, and the info very often vanishes from the page. Here is one example of "live" link.
One thing I would suggest is breaking up the Careers section into subsections for ease of reading and navigation.
Really great work putting all of this together! I am feeling hopeful about this page's chances. Please let me know if any clarification is needed about anything I revised or wrote here on the talk page.
HussainHx (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Is it okay now to add Boelter's wife's name?
[edit]I have a question. Is it okay now to add Boelter's wife's name into the draft? She just became headlines upon investigation. 2600:1702:5225:C010:1CF:FC0B:D6C3:69AE (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2025 (UTC)