Draft talk:Sleepiest

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Software: Computing

	This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
	This draft is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United Kingdom

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom

Podcasting

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting

Comment for reviewer – resubmission note

Thank you for the previous feedback. I've now added several new independent, reliable sources to strengthen the notability of Sleepiest. These include in-depth coverage from Common Sense Media and the Sleep Foundation, both of which critically evaluate the app’s features and user experience. I’ve also included recognition from PureWow and Silentnight, as well as existing citations from Audible, Apple Podcasts, and Awwwards. I believe the updated draft now meets the notability and sourcing criteria. 81.31.110.242 (talk) 11:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Second reviewer note – TechCrunch source added

Since my last submission, I’ve added a new citation from TechCrunch (2023), which references Koala Moon as preloaded content on the Storybutton podcast device. This source strengthens the notability of Sleepiest’s podcast network, particularly by showing third-party distribution and recognition in a major tech publication. I believe this, in combination with the other sources already cited (Common Sense Media, Sleep Foundation, PureWow, etc.), further supports notability and independent coverage across multiple media domains. 81.31.110.242 (talk) 13:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up Note for Reviewer – Additional Source Added

Following previous feedback, I've now added an additional independent, high-authority citation from The New York Times. The archived version of a 2022 opinion column includes a direct mention of Sleepiest in the context of tools for improving children's sleep routines. While brief, this editorial reference strengthens the app’s demonstrated public presence in reliable media, alongside existing coverage from TechCrunch, Common Sense Media, Sleep Foundation, and others. The article is no longer fully accessible on the live site, but the original mention is preserved via the Wayback Machine and properly cited in the updated draft. Thank you again for your time and review consideration! 86.16.162.16 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]