Draft talk:Nutarianism

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a subject that was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally and for lack of asserted importance, because... (your reason here) --Miyojewolt S Nasonth (talk) 20:41, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found a link for it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruitarianism, so there is at least one other person beside me who considers Nutarianism to be a legitimate article.

Which means it's not the case that the article was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally."

Additionally, I'm pretty sure I've seen at least a few links to Nutarianism in other articles. I don't know how to search for these links, but if there's a way to do so I'm sure the moderator will find there are multiple links to Nutarianism from multiple articles.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here) --Miyojewolt S Nasonth (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found a link for it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruitarianism, so there is at least one other person beside me who considers Nutarianism to be a legitimate article.

Which means it's not the case that the article was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally."

Additionally, I'm pretty sure I've seen at least a few links to Nutarianism in other articles. I don't know how to search for these links, but if there's a way to do so I'm sure the moderator will find there are multiple links to Nutarianism from multiple articles.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (I found a link for it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruitarianism, so there is at least one other person beside me who considers Nutarianism to be a legitimate article.

Which means it's not the case that the article was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally."

Additionally, I'm pretty sure I've seen at least a few links to Nutarianism in other articles. I don't know how to search for these links, but if there's a way to do so I'm sure the moderator will find there are multiple links to Nutarianism from multiple articles.) --Miyojewolt S Nasonth (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

Or maybe the initially created article got deleted because I didn't write my explanation in the proper place, within the parentheses "(your reason here)."

If this is the reason, "your reason here" needs to be replaced with "your reason must be written precisely here between the parentheses" so people are aware the placement of their explanation matters. Even though it shouldn't matter. --Miyojewolt S Nasonth (talk) 27 April 2025

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (any human reading the article besides a computer will recognise that the article as I've begun it contains the major points about Nutatarianism, and only a non-human would say it is "a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article."

Further, I'm quite certain once people start clicking on it, they will soon start adding more to the subject matter than I personally know much about. In particular, Fruitarians, Nutatarians, and Jains. your reason here) --Miyojewolt S Nasonth (talk) 23:22, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]