Draft:Theological Biophysics of the Shroud of Turin
Submission declined on 23 July 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Dkmillar33 (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Theological Biophysics of the Shroud of Turin
[edit]Theological Biophysics of the Shroud: A Quantum-Coherence Framework for Christ’s Resurrection is a speculative white paper authored by David K. Millar, founder of NeuroSynergetics Inc., and self-published via Zenodo on May 30, 2025.[1] The paper introduces a hypothesis termed theological biophysics, which interprets the resurrection of Jesus Christ as a quantum-coherent biological event. It proposes that a structured burst of ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs), emitted from trillions of mitochondria, oxidized the surface of the Shroud of Turin to produce the image observed today.
The hypothesis integrates elements from quantum biology, redox signaling, nonlinear optics, and Christian theology. It attempts to account for several anomalous features of the Shroud that remain unexplained by traditional image formation hypotheses.
Background
[edit]The Shroud of Turin is a linen cloth bearing a faint full-body image of a man with wounds consistent with crucifixion. Scientific investigations over the past century have documented a number of unusual characteristics, including:
- No detectable pigments, dyes, or paint in the image area
- Lack of brush marks or direct physical contact
- Discoloration limited to the outer 200–600 nanometers of the linen fibers[2][3]
- Ultraviolet-light-like spectral properties[4]
- A negative image that becomes clearer when photo-inverted
- Three-dimensional spatial information encoded in image intensity[5]
- Anatomical detail that correlates with tissue depth and proximity to the cloth
A 1988 radiocarbon study dated the cloth to the medieval period (1260–1390 CE),[6] but follow-up analyses have challenged its reliability due to potential contamination and sampling issues.[7] In 2023, a new X-ray dating technique placed the Shroud’s origin at approximately 2,000 years ago, aligning with the traditional historical timeline of Jesus of Nazareth.[8]
Millar’s model proposes that these observed features are consistent with a photonic imprint produced by a biologically coherent light emission from within the body.
Hypothesis Summary
[edit]The model frames the resurrection as a coherence cascade—a sudden reordering of biological systems resulting in radiant light emission. It centers on three mechanisms:
- Spin realignment of heme-bound iron atoms
- Reversal of ferroptosis, a redox-driven cell death process involving iron
- Mitochondrial reactivation, producing ultraweak photon emissions
The event is described as a photonic burst—termed a photonic echo—that imprints the linen with a structured, non-contact image. The model likens heme to a toroidal quantum antenna, similar in structure to chlorophyll, but functioning to emit rather than absorb light.
Image Formation Mechanism
[edit]The model proposes to explain several long-standing physical features of the Shroud:
Superficial Oxidation
[edit]The image is confined to the outermost 200–600 nm of the fibers—similar to results achieved using ultraviolet laser pulses in laboratory experiments.[9] The model proposes that a coherent biological burst of UV-range photons could replicate this effect without pigment or pressure.
Ultraviolet Emission (UPEs)
[edit]Mitochondria under oxidative stress emit biophotons, including in the near-UV spectrum around 340 nm.[10] The paper posits that if these emissions were released in a coherent, phase-aligned burst, they could oxidize linen fibers much like a biological laser.
Energy Calculations and Amplification
[edit]The calculated energy output of the proposed burst is ~17.5 joules, derived from an estimated 3 × 10¹⁶ mitochondria.[1] While this alone would not be sufficient to cause visible fiber damage, the paper invokes nonlinear optical phenomena such as two-photon absorption and constructive interference to explain image formation. As outlined in its energy amplification table, coherence effects could magnify the impact by a factor of 10× to 100×, reducing the number of emitting mitochondria required to match observed image energy (~1,000 J).[1]
Negative Image Properties
[edit]The image on the Shroud is negative: darker where the body was closer to the cloth. The hypothesis proposes that the photonic burst radiated outward in a proximity-dependent pattern, producing oxidative effects analogous to photochemical contact printing.
Three-Dimensional Encoding
[edit]The model proposes that coherent photonic decay followed an inverse-square gradient. The resulting intensity map correlates with anatomical depth, producing a 3D effect when digitally processed.[11]
Mitochondrial Density Correlation
[edit]Millar’s model notes that the highest-resolution image areas (face, chest, hands) also correspond with tissues that have the greatest mitochondrial density. Regions with lower mitochondrial concentrations (e.g., lower legs) appear less defined. This proposed correlation is presented as a testable prediction.[1]
Theological Integration
[edit]The hypothesis integrates scripture and theology with biological metaphors:
- “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12) is interpreted as literal biological light
- “The life of the flesh is in the blood” (Leviticus 17:11) is mapped onto heme as the quantum substrate of redox coherence
- “Your body is a temple” (1 Corinthians 6:19) is linked to mitochondria as centers of energy and sacred function
- The resurrection is seen as a reversal of entropy—biological and spiritual coherence manifesting simultaneously
The Shroud is interpreted not as artwork, but as a radiant artifact encoding the quantum geometry of resurrection.
Limitations
[edit]The paper acknowledges several limitations:
- No biological precedent exists for organism-wide post-mortem coherence
- Biophoton emissions are typically weak and incoherent under normal conditions
- Mechanisms like “divine quantum stasis fields” remain metaphysical and untestable
Millar presents the model as a visionary synthesis rather than a strictly empirical or falsifiable scientific claim.
Reception
[edit]The paper was self-published via Zenodo and has not undergone peer review. As of July 2025, it has not been cited in academic journals or discussed in public forums beyond the author’s own social media posts. It remains an independent, speculative contribution to science-theology discourse.
Future Research Directions
[edit]The paper outlines several testable predictions and areas for exploration:
- Mapping image intensity against known mitochondrial density distributions
- Laboratory studies of synchronized mitochondrial biophoton emissions
- Optical modeling of UV-light interactions with ancient linen and burial resins
- Simulation of heme-based spin alignment and ferroptosis reversal
While the resurrection event is framed as non-repeatable, individual components may be experimentally modeled or partially validated.
See Also
[edit]- Shroud of Turin#Image formation hypotheses
- Quantum biology
- Biophoton
- Ferroptosis
- Redox signaling
- Two-photon absorption
- Exclusion zone (physics)
- Resurrection of Jesus
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Millar, David K. (2025). Theological Biophysics of the Shroud: A Quantum-Coherence Framework for Christ’s Resurrection. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15556235
- ^ Fanti, Giulio, et al. (2010). “Microscopic and Macroscopic Characteristics of the Shroud of Turin Image.” Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 54(4): 040201.
- ^ Di Lazzaro, Paolo, et al. (2010). “Superficial and Shroud-like Coloration of Linen by Short Laser Pulses in the Vacuum Ultraviolet.” Applied Optics, 51(36): 8567–8578.
- ^ Di Lazzaro, Paolo, et al. (2010).
- ^ Jackson, John P., et al. (1984). “Correlation of Image Intensity on the Turin Shroud with the 3-D Structure of a Human Body.” Applied Optics, 23(14): 2244–2270.
- ^ Damon, P.E., et al. (1989). “Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Nature, 337: 611–615.
- ^ Rogers, Raymond N. (2005). “Studies on the Radiocarbon Sample from the Shroud of Turin.” Thermochimica Acta, 425(1–2): 189–204.
- ^ De Caro, L., & Giannini, C. (2023). “X-ray dating of a linen fabric from the Shroud of Turin.” Heritage, 6(1): 1370–1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6010071
- ^ Di Lazzaro, Paolo, et al. (2010).
- ^ Popp, Fritz-Albert. (2003). “Properties of Biophotons and Their Theoretical Implications.” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 41(5): 391–402.
- ^ Jackson, John P., et al. (1984).
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.