Draft:The Hasanabi Doctrine

Submission declined on 18 June 2025 by Rambley (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Rambley 3 days ago. Last edited by Rambley 3 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

The HasanAbi Doctrine is a notion created by Hasan Piker in which he states that countries should have nuclear weapons or should get some if accused of having them. The first mention of "The HasanAbi Doctrine" was on his live stream on March 12, 2022^[1], where he was discussing the Russian invasion of Ukraine and later cited again in reference to the Israel-Iran War.

The Doctrine

Hasan Piker has argued that nuclear armed states are less likely to engage in direct warfare, typically resorting to proxy war instead. However, this assertion is not absolute, as evidenced by recent confrontations between nuclear powers such as the India-Pakistan conflict where direct hostilities have occurred despite mutual nuclear deterrence.

The Rules

The doctrine rules are as follows:

As a nation, you should have Nuclear Weapons
Do not give up your Nuclear Weapons (Example Ukraine)
If you don't have Nuclear Weapons and you are accused of having them, acquire them as soon as possible.

References

^ HasanAbi VODs Backup (2022-03-13). HasanAbi March 12, 2022 – Russian Invasion Day 17: Iran US Consulate Attack; Putin is not Hitler. Retrieved 2025-06-18 – via YouTube.

[1] HasanAbi VODs Backup (2022-03-13). HasanAbi March 12, 2022 – Russian Invasion Day 17: Iran US Consulate Attack; Putin is not Hitler. Retrieved 2025-06-18 – via YouTube.

[1]