Draft:Nakba in International Law
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs) 46 hours ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
.jpg)
The Nakba, or "catastrophe" in Arabic, refers to the mass displacement and dispossession of approximately 750,000 Palestinians during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the creation of the State of Israel. From the perspective of international law, the Nakba has become an evolving legal and scholarly issue, engaging principles of forced displacement, the right of return, war crimes, and racial discrimination.
Historical Context
[edit]During the 1948 conflict, more than 400 Palestinian villages were depopulated or destroyed, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinian residents became refugees. The events are memorialized annually and remain central to the Palestinian national narrative. Many scholars and legal experts argue that these events constitute violations of international humanitarian law and may amount to crimes under international legal frameworks.[1]
Forced Displacement and the Geneva Conventions
[edit]The mass expulsion and displacement of Palestinians in 1948 is widely viewed as a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, specifically Article 49, which prohibits the forcible transfer of civilians in occupied territories.[2]
The Right of Return
[edit]The right of return for Palestinian refugees is enshrined in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948), as well as in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees the right of individuals to return to their country. Amnesty International has characterized Israel’s longstanding refusal to allow Palestinian refugees to return as a violation of international law that has perpetuated decades of suffering.[3]
A Continuing Crime?
[edit]Contemporary legal analyses suggest that the Nakba should be understood not merely as a historical event, but as an ongoing and continuous violation of international law. According to scholars at the American University in Cairo, the Nakba may represent a composite crime involving ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and forced displacement—elements that call for a reassessment of how international law conceptualizes such phenomena.[4]
The notion of the Nakba as a "continuing crime" has gained traction, implying that its effects—refugee status, denial of return, property expropriation—are not subject to statutes of limitation.[5]
War Crimes and Accountability
[edit]Several scholars and human rights organizations have documented acts committed during the Nakba that may amount to war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. These include mass killings, destruction of civilian homes, and deliberate displacement. However, practical challenges—such as the ICC’s limited temporal jurisdiction—continue to hinder accountability.[2]
Apartheid and Discriminatory Practices
[edit]Reports by human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have argued that the systemic discrimination faced by Palestinians—both within Israel and in the occupied territories—constitutes apartheid under international law.[6]
Toward Legal Recognition of the Nakba
[edit]Recent legal scholarship advocates for recognizing the Nakba as a distinct legal concept in international law. Analogous to the recognition of genocide or apartheid, this proposal aims to provide a coherent legal framework that could facilitate accountability and reparation.[7]
Challenges and Obstacles
[edit]Legal recognition and redress for the Nakba face numerous challenges, including geopolitical constraints at the United Nations, lack of binding enforcement mechanisms, and the non-retroactive nature of many international legal instruments. Moreover, there is significant international political resistance to reframing historical narratives in legal terms.
See Also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ [1](https://www.un.org/unispal/about-the-nakba/)
- ^ a b [2](https://www.academia.edu/27349852/Challenging_the_Nakba_through_International_Law)
- ^ [3](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/05/israels-refusal-to-grant-palestinian-refugees-right-to-return-has-fuelled-seven-decades-of-suffering/)
- ^ [4](https://aps.aucegypt.edu/en/articles/1392/76-years-of-nakba-conceptualizing-a-new-crime-in-international-law)
- ^ [5](https://ihgc.as.virginia.edu/ihgcs-personhoods-lab-ongoing-nakba-narrative-form-and-protection-international-law)
- ^ [6](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/05/europe-authorities-must-protect-expression-nakba/)
- ^ [7](https://www.columbialawreview.org/content/toward-nakba-as-a-legal-concept/)