Draft:Julkar Nine
| Submission declined on 8 August 2025 by Sksatsuma (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 2 August 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 7 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 August 2025 by TurboSuperA+ (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by TurboSuperA+ 7 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 August 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RangersRus 7 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 August 2025 by Sksatsuma (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Sksatsuma 8 days ago. | |
Comment: References 1,3 and 4 are webstores and are not considered reliable. Reference 2 is primary as it is the subjects' own work. These sources do not demonstrate notability.I would highly suggest reading through the living person notability requirements as well as the artist/author notability requirements for help. sksatsuma 00:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Lacks independent and reliable sources to establish notability. There were no significant changes to the article since the last AfC submission/rejection, either. One cannot simply brute force an article through. TurboSuperA+[talk] 06:10, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Webstores aren't considered significant coverage or independent from the subject, these are requirements for demonstrating notability. sksatsuma 09:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Sksatsuma (talk | contribs) 34 hours ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? |
 |
Julkar Nine | |
|---|---|
| জুলকার নাইন | |
| Born | 01-Feb-1988 Bagerhat, Bangladesh |
| Occupation | Author |
Julkar Nine is a Bangladeshi novelist, he made his debut with the novel of Chondromoni (চন্দ্রমণি).[1] and his first short story 'Nijela Khatun and Hasnahena' (নিজেলা খাতুন ও হাসনাহেনা) was published in the daily Sangram on 26-April-2019[2]
Notable novels by Julkar Nine, Chondromoni (চন্দ্রমণি)[1] Akhijole-Bosonto (আঁখিজলে বসন্ত)[3] Dristidighol (দৃষ্টিদীঘল)[4]
References
[edit]- Chondromoni (চন্দ্রমণি) ISBN 978-984-8056-33-2
- ^ a b Nine, Julkar. চন্দ্রমণি - জুলকার নাইন – via www.rokomari.com.
- ^ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Nijela_Khatun_and_Hasnahena_%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE_%E0%A6%96%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%A8_%E0%A6%93_%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B9%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BE.pdf
- ^ Nine, Julkar. আঁখিজলে বসন্ত - জুলকার নাইন – via www.rokomari.com.
- ^ "জুলকার নাইন এর লেখা ও প্রতিভা প্রকাশ প্রকাশনীর বই "দৃষ্টিদীঘল | Buy this book at 150 BDT from বইসদাই - boisodai.com | Bangladesh".