Draft:Info Tech Research Group
Submission declined on 30 July 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 27 June 2025 by CharlieMehta (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by CharlieMehta 43 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 53 days ago.
| |
Comment: A single source, no matter how good (and the one cited here really isn't!), is nowhere near enough to establish notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: see WP:BOSS. Theroadislong (talk) 20:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. KBall97 (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Info-Tech Research Group is a research and advisory organization in the technology and human resources sectors. The company was founded in 1997 by Joel McLean.
Info-Tech Research Group established McLean & Company in 2010, a division that publishes human resources research.[1]
Info-Tech Research Group also operates SoftwareReviews, a division that collects enterprise software user feedback.
References
[edit]- ^ Clark, Christopher (December 8, 2021). "Info-Tech at 25". London Inc Magazine.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.