Draft:Certified Midwife
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 513 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 24 June 2025 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by S0091 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by S0091 9 days ago.
| ![]() |
Comment: Even the section titles make it appear biased and argumentative. Consider WP:AND. All we're looking for is a description of what has already been said by secondary, independent sources. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: We're looking for SIRS, and it should not be written as an argumentative essay or in a manner to promote an organization or subject matter, everything must be neutral. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Many of the sources are primary and/or not independent (written or published by those affiliated such as Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health). Also, ResearchGate is not a reliable publisher so need a better source. S0091 (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
A Certified Midwife (CM) is a professional midwifery credential in the United States issued by the American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB). Certified Midwives are trained to provide full-scope midwifery care, including prenatal, birth, postpartum, newborn, and well-person gynecologic care. CMs complete graduate-level education accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education (ACME), pass the same national certification exam as Certified Nurse Midwives (CNMs), and meet identical professional standards. The primary distinction is that CMs do not hold a nursing license and instead enter midwifery through a health-related or science-based academic background.[1]
History
[edit]The Certified Midwife (CM) credential was launched in 1997 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) and the AMCB to create a graduate-level, academically rigorous midwifery pathway for individuals with relevant health or science degrees who are not nurses.[2][3]
The credential emerged around the same time as the Certified Professional Midwife (CPM), introduced in 1994–1995 by the North American Registry of Midwives (NARM), which provided certification for midwives trained via apprenticeship and competency-based methods.[4]
Both credentials fall under the category of direct-entry midwifery, but their pathways differ significantly. Certified Midwives must complete a graduate-level program accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education (ACME) and pass a national board examination administered by the AMCB.[5][6]
The development of the CM credential was partly a response to the rise of the CPM, and was seen by some as an effort to offer a more standardized, academically grounded direct-entry midwifery alternative within regulated systems. Proponents of the CM model have emphasized its clinical rigor and institutional legitimacy, contrasting it with non-academic, apprenticeship-based preparation.[7][8][9]
Legal status
[edit]As of 2025, Certified Midwives are licensed in the following U.S. states and jurisdictions: Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.[10]
Numerous other states are actively considering legislation to license Certified Midwives, often using the CM credential as a way to expand the midwifery workforce while maintaining education and practice standards in line with international norms.
ACNM has called for states to license CMs under existing boards of nursing or medicine and supports full practice authority across all jurisdictions.[11]
Scope of practice
[edit]In states where they are licensed, Certified Midwives have the same scope of practice as Certified Nurse-Midwives, including prescriptive authority, management of labor and birth, well-person gynecologic care, family planning, and primary care within their scope.[12]
CMs often work in hospitals, clinics, birth centers, and home birth settings, depending on local regulations.
The development of the CM credential
[edit]The creation of the Certified Midwife (CM) credential by the ACNM in 1997 marked a pivotal shift in U.S. midwifery. Designed to open the profession to individuals with health or science degrees rather than nursing credentials, the CM pathway paralleled the CNM in education standards and national board certification but removed the requirement of a nursing license. While intended to expand access, the move caused significant friction within academic nursing.
This tension emerged most clearly after the passage of the New York Midwifery Practice Act of 1992, which authorized licensure of non-nurse midwives under the state's Board of Education. In response, SUNY Downstate Medical Center developed a dual-track program, with one pathway for nurses and another for direct-entry students who completed additional coursework to achieve “nursing equivalency.”[13][14]
Dorothea Lang, a past ACNM president and influential figure in New York midwifery policy, was instrumental in advocating for this separation. Her early exposure to non-nurse midwifery in Japan shaped her belief that professional midwives need not also be nurses. Under her leadership, a coalition of CNMs pushed for independent midwifery regulation outside the nursing board’s authority.[14]
However, these developments alarmed many in academic nursing. ACNM’s decision to remove the word “nurse” from much of its branding—such as renaming the Journal of Nurse-Midwifery to the Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health—fueled fears that midwifery was moving away from nursing entirely. In a 2003 article in Nursing Outlook, advanced practice nursing leaders expressed concern that the inclusion of non-nurses created confusion and undermined cohesion within the broader field of Advanced Practice Nursing (APN). They wrote:
"The movement of the American College of Nurse Midwives to include midwives who are not nurses but who complete a certified midwifery program that is not nurse driven makes for confusion... It is a professional imperative for ACNM leaders to differentiate the competencies expected of APN midwives from those expected of midwives who are not nurses or who lack graduate degrees."[15]
This divide has persisted, with some leaders calling for clearer distinctions in regulatory frameworks for CNMs versus CMs. Others, including Rooks, have framed the development of the CM credential as a professional response to the Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) credential launched in 1994–1995 by the North American Registry of Midwives. By offering a university-based, accredited, and medically recognized pathway for non-nurses, the CM route was seen as an attempt to maintain professional control over direct-entry midwifery without aligning with the apprenticeship-based CPM model.[16]
Licensing and Legislative Debate
[edit]Efforts to license Certified Midwives (CMs) have progressed slowly since the credential’s creation in 1997. In some states, existing licensure pathways for direct-entry midwives, such as the Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) have shaped or limited legislative efforts to introduce the CM credential. In contrast, in states where CMs are already licensed, such as New York, the existence of the CM pathway has been cited in opposition to CPM licensure.
For example, in a 2025 New York State Senate hearing, one witness testified:
“Thirty years ago NY put its faith in the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) to create a non-nurse direct-entry pathway to the midwifery profession; however, this has been a failed effort, with a paltry 150 candidates credentialed nationally in three decades, while in the same time period over 4700 CPMs have been educated and credentialled nationally. Passage of a single CPM licensing bill would dramatically increase New York’s maternity care workforce. It is time for NY to realize that they put their eggs in the wrong basket.”[17]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, New York temporarily authorized out-of-state CPMs to practice under an executive order, but permanent legislation stalled, with CM licensure cited as a sufficient alternative.[18]
CPM advocates maintain that while CMs are hospital-trained, CPMs offer unique community-based care crucial for underserved populations, and argue that the CM pathway has been used to justify excluding CPMs from state licensure and reimbursement frameworks.[19]
Uptake
[edit]Although Certified Midwives (CMs) were created to offer a formally educated, direct-entry midwifery pathway comparable to Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs), uptake has remained limited. Since the credential’s inception in 1997, fewer than 500 individuals have ever been certified as CMs, and as of 2025, fewer than 150 are actively practicing across the United States.[20][21] Despite meeting accredited graduate-level educational standards and being qualified for hospital-based care, CMs have not become the dominant direct-entry midwifery pathway. In contrast, Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs), a credential based on apprenticeship and competency evaluation, has become more widely adopted to fill the role of direct-entry midwives in many communities.[22] [4]
Workforce data and diversity
[edit]A 2023 national workforce analysis of AMCB-certified midwives found that there were 12,997 certificants between 2016 and 2020, with Certified Midwives comprising fewer than 2% of this group. The workforce was predominantly white, female, and employed in hospital settings, with limited racial diversity and geographic distribution. Researchers have cited CM expansion as a promising strategy to increase the availability of midwifery care.[23]
Tracking Challenges and National Data
[edit]A 2023 study published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth found that only about 60% of AMCB-certified midwives were accurately captured in the National Provider Identifier (NPI) registry due to coding inconsistencies. The authors developed a recoding method using credential text to more accurately identify CNMs and CMs in national datasets, improving workforce tracking for policy and planning purposes.[24]
Comparison between credentials
[edit]Credential | Education Requirements | Licensing Exam | Certifying Exam | Licensure Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Certified Nurse-Midwife (CNM) | Bachelor’s degree in nursing (BSN) + ACME-accredited graduate midwifery program | NCLEX-RN | American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) | Licensed in all 50 states and U.S. territories |
Certified Midwife (CM) | Bachelor’s degree (health-related or equivalent) + ACME-accredited graduate midwifery program | none | American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) | Licensed in 13 jurisdictions |
Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) | High school diploma or equivalent + MEAC-accredited program or NARM Portfolio Evaluation Process (PEP) | None | North American Registry of Midwives (NARM) | Licensed in 36 states (with varying limitations) |
See also
[edit]- Certified Nurse Midwife
- Certified Professional Midwife
- Midwifery in the United States
- American College of Nurse-Midwives
- International Confederation of Midwives
References
[edit]- ^ Thumm, E.B., Emeis, C.L., Snapp, C., Doublestein, L., Rees, R., Vanderlaan, J., & Tanner, T. (2023). The Certified Nurse-Midwife and Certified Midwife Workforce. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 68(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13499
- ^ AMCB – American Midwifery Certification Board
- ^ Marzalik PR, Feltham KJ, Jefferson K, Pekin K. "Midwifery education in the US—Certified Nurse-Midwife, Certified Midwife and Certified Professional Midwife." Midwife. 2018;60:9–12.
- ^ a b Vedam S, Stoll K, MacDorman MF, Cramer R, Cheyney M, Declercq E, Kennedy HP. "Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes." PLOS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192523. [1]
- ^ Niemczyk NA, Cutts A, Perlman DB. "Prior Work and Educational Experience Are Not Associated with Successful Completion of a Master's-Level, Distance Education Midwifery Program." J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2018;63(2):161–167.
- ^ Stec MA, Arbour MW. "Labor and Delivery Nursing Experience: A Prerequisite for Midwifery Education?" J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2018;63(2):157–160.
- ^ Rooks JP. Midwifery and Childbirth in America. Temple University Press, 1997.
- ^ Jefferson K, MacKenzie RK, Hackley B, Perlman D. "Knowledge of US midwifery credentials among ACNM members." J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2019;64(2):158–166. PMID: 31600026.
- ^ Fullerton JT, Bash M. "Integration of qualified nurses and non-nurses in midwifery education: Editorial review." J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2000;45(1):45–54.
- ^ ACNM – American College of Nurse-Midwives
- ^ American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM). (2022). Position Statement: Independent Midwifery Practice. Retrieved from https://www.midwife.org
- ^ American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2018). Joint Statement of Practice Relations between Obstetrician–Gynecologists and Certified Nurse-Midwives/Certified Midwives. Retrieved from https://www.acog.org
- ^ Davis-Floyd, R. (2005). Certified Professional Midwives in the United States. In V. Tritten, K. R. Davis-Floyd, & J. Chalmers (Eds.), Birth Models That Work (pp. 315–349). University of California Press.
- ^ a b Rooks, J. P. (2007). Relationships Between CNMs and CMs and Other Midwives, Nurses, and Physicians. Professional issues in midwifery'. pp. 1-40. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265758801_Relationships_Between_CNMs_and_CMs_and_Other_Midwives_Nurses_and_Physicians
- ^ Hanson, C. M., & Hamric, A. B. (2003). Reflections on the continuing evolution of advanced practice nursing. Nursing Outlook, 51(5), 203–211. doi:[10.1016/S0029-6554(03)00154-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(03)00154-7)
- ^ Rooks, J. P. (2000). Professional midwifery and interprofessional relationships. In: F. W. Marshall & E. M. Raynor (Eds.), Professional Issues in Midwifery. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
- ^ "Testimony in Support of Certified Professional Midwifery Bill A1125" (PDF). New York State Senate Committee on Higher Education. February 2025. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 18, 2025. Retrieved June 15, 2025.
- ^ Arpey, Jack (January 23, 2024). "Advocates push bill that would allow certified professional midwives in New York". Spectrum News 1 Central New York. Retrieved June 15, 2025.
- ^ Jefferson, Karen; Bouchard, Mary Ellen; Summers, Lisa (January 1, 2021). "The Regulation of Professional Midwifery in the United States". Journal of Nursing Regulation. 11 (4): 26–38. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(20)30174-5. Retrieved June 15, 2025.
- ^ AMCB 2023 Annual Report, American Midwifery Certification Board. Retrieved June 15, 2025.
- ^ Archived AMCB CM Registry Search.
- ^ Jefferson, Karen; Bouchard, Mary Ellen; Summers, Lisa (2021). "The Regulation of Professional Midwifery in the United States". Journal of Nursing Regulation, 11(4): 26–38. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(20)30174-5.
- ^ Thumm, E.B., et al. (2023). The Certified Nurse-Midwife and Certified Midwife Workforce. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 68(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13499
- ^ Vanderlaan, J. & Jefferson, K. (2023). Evaluation of a method to identify midwives in national provider identifier data. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(809). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06122-2
- Draft articles on North America
- Draft articles on medicine and health
- AfC submissions on other topics
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/0 days ago
- AfC submissions with the same name as existing articles
- AfC submissions by date/24 June 2025
- AfC submissions by date/16 June 2025
- AfC submissions by date/15 June 2025
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.