Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 890 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Carepatron (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 25 hours ago by JamiefrewSF (talk: D · +) · Last edited 25 hours ago by JamiefrewSF

Submission declined on 3 August 2025 by JesusisGreat7 (talk).

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by JesusisGreat7 39 hours ago. Last edited by JamiefrewSF 25 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 28 July 2025 by MediaKyle (talk).

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Declined by MediaKyle 7 days ago.

Submission declined on 23 July 2025 by RangersRus (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by RangersRus 13 days ago.

Submission declined on 21 July 2025 by Ibjaja055 (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Ibjaja055 14 days ago.

Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. JamiefrewSF (talk) 03:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

DISPLAYTITLE

Carepatron

Carepatron is a healthcare practice management software platform that integrates electronic health records (EHR), telehealth, appointment scheduling, billing, task management, and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered clinical tools into a unified workspace.^[1]^[2].

History

Founded in 2021 by Jamie Frew and David Pene, Carepatron provides healthcare tools for solo practitioners and small teams. In July 2022, the company raised NZD 1.6 million (approx. $980,000) in pre-seed funding led by Blackbird Ventures. This was followed by an AU$ 6 million (approx. $4 million) seed round in late 2023, co-led by Blackbird and TQ Ventures.^[3]^[4]^[5]

In 2025, Carepatron was cited in a study about Ezra N.S. Lockhart on the effects of telehealth towards ADHD treatment^[6]. Carepatron was also highly commended at the NZ Hi-Tech Awards under the Most Innovative Hi-Tech Software Solution category in the same year^[7]

Platform Overview

Carepatron has an EHR & Documentation function that can be utilized for creating custom clinical templates (e.g., SOAP, DAP, BIRP), securing document storage, transcribing notes, and coding support. The platform also has a Telehealth feature which enables integrated browser-based video calls, virtual waiting rooms, and secure messaging.

Users can also manage online bookings, implement multi-time zone calendar sync, and automate SMS/email reminders in-app, as well as handle payment billing and insurance. The platform also carries AI capabilities and other practice management functions.

According to Carepatron's website, their platform is also HIPAA, PIPEDA, GDPR, SOC2, and PDPA compliant.

Pricing Model

Carepatron uses a freemium model with tiered plans^[8]^[9]. Monthly user-based pricing starts from $0 (Free) to $29 (Advanced).

Relevant Media Coverage

“Carepatron Raises $1.6M to Help Small Healthcare Practices” – TechCrunch
“Transforming Leadership in Healthcare with Jamie Frew” – YouTube

External Links

Official website: https://www.carepatron.com

References

^ Church, Matthew. "Carepatron Review 2025: Is It Right For Your Practice?". Choosing Therapy. Retrieved July 9, 2025.
^ "Transforming Healthcare Management: The Carepatron Journey". MedHealth Review.
^ "Blackbird invests in Carepatron's 'radically accessible' healthcare management platform". TechCrunch. Catherine Shu. 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
^ "Blackbird doubles down on Kiwi healthtech Carepatron in $6 million Seed round". Startup Daily. 27 November 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
^ Rotherham, Fiona (14 August 2024). "Investors Target Earlier Stage Healthtech Companies". NBR. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
^ Lockhart, Ezra N.S. (11 February 2025). "Improving ADHD Treatment Attendance Through Teletherapy: A Quasi-experimental Analysis of Technological Features". Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00490-6.
^ "2025 Winners". NZ Hi-Tech Awards. Retrieved 2025. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
^ "Carepatron Review". Saas Genius. Retrieved May 7, 2025. {{cite web}}: |first1= missing |last1= (help)
^ Srivastava, Saumya. "6 Top-Rated Free Telemedicine Software". Software Advice. Retrieved July 11, 2024.

[1] Church, Matthew. "Carepatron Review 2025: Is It Right For Your Practice?". Choosing Therapy. Retrieved July 9, 2025.

[2] "Transforming Healthcare Management: The Carepatron Journey". MedHealth Review.

[3] "Blackbird invests in Carepatron's 'radically accessible' healthcare management platform". TechCrunch. Catherine Shu. 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.

[4] "Blackbird doubles down on Kiwi healthtech Carepatron in $6 million Seed round". Startup Daily. 27 November 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.

[5] Rotherham, Fiona (14 August 2024). "Investors Target Earlier Stage Healthtech Companies". NBR. Retrieved August 15, 2024.

[6] Lockhart, Ezra N.S. (11 February 2025). "Improving ADHD Treatment Attendance Through Teletherapy: A Quasi-experimental Analysis of Technological Features". Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00490-6.

[7] "2025 Winners". NZ Hi-Tech Awards. Retrieved 2025. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)

[8] "Carepatron Review". Saas Genius. Retrieved May 7, 2025. {{cite web}}: |first1= missing |last1= (help)

[9] Srivastava, Saumya. "6 Top-Rated Free Telemedicine Software". Software Advice. Retrieved July 11, 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]