Draft:Calsoft
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,199 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 5 May 2025 by GSS (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 30 April 2025 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Bobby Cohn 9 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 April 2025 by ScrabbleTiles (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by ScrabbleTiles 10 days ago. | ![]() |
Calsoft is a digital product engineering services company headquartered in San Jose, California, with operations in India. The company was founded in 1998 by Anupam Bhide, who is also a board member of the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) India chapter.[1]
History
[edit]Calsoft was established in 1998 as a product engineering and services company focused on storage, networking, and enterprise software. Over the years, the company expanded its services to include areas such as data engineering, AI, cloud technologies, and virtualization.
Notable collaborations
[edit]In October 2023, Calsoft partnered with NVIDIA to develop AI-powered solutions for infrastructure automation projects in India. [2][3]
References
[edit]- ^ "Board Members | SNIA | Experts on Data". www.snia.org. Retrieved 2025-05-06.
- ^ "Calsoft, Nvidia help automate toll booths". The Times of India. 2024-08-23. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2025-05-06.
- ^ Mariash, Lexi (2024-08-21). "High-Tech Highways: India Uses NVIDIA Accelerated Computing to Ease Tollbooth Traffic". NVIDIA Blog. Retrieved 2025-05-06.
- Draft articles on business and economics
- Draft articles on computing
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/3 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/06 May 2025
- AfC submissions by date/05 May 2025
- AfC submissions by date/30 April 2025
- AfC submissions by date/29 April 2025
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.