Diagnostic Enterprise Method
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The Diagnostic Enterprise Method (DEM) is a framework of guiding principles for human resources management theory. It is described as being derived from Frederick Winslow Taylor's (1856–1915) principles. It outlines strategies and methodologies designed to enable organizations to restructure internal work processes, particularly in the integration of emerging technologies.[citation needed]
Background
[edit]Taylor contributed to scientific management[1] through experiments such as measuring the time required to complete specific tasks. One of his objectives was to improve the allocation of workers within set time frames.[2]
Taylor later established four principles aimed at increasing workplace efficiency, which became a framework for further management theorizing. The principles are:
- Analyzing how each worker performs their assigned task to devise improved methods.
- Codifying new methods into written rules to serve as standards for work.
- Selecting workers with the necessary abilities and training them to follow the standard rules.
- Establishing shared goals between workers and implementing a pay system that recognizes individuals who exceed their assigned responsibilities.[3]
Derivatives of Taylor's method
[edit]Systematic method
[edit]Labor analysis builds upon Taylor's techniques, with a focus on developing a detailed job position. Proponents suggest that managers should identify and understand their worker's abilities to improve performance within the enterprise.[4]
The short facts method starts with a case study, typically brief (e.g., four paragraphs), describing a simple problem. This case is then analyzed by a group of employees and managers within the organization, followed by a discussion to identify potential solutions.[5]
The strategic analysis method is grounded in systems thinking.[6] In this method, managers first define desired outcomes for the enterprise and establish guiding principles. Subsequently, specific, measurable goals are created. Finally, managers develop a strategic plan based on the preceding steps.[7]
Harvard method
[edit]The Harvard method was developed by the Harvard Business School and is used in its Management Business Academy course. Enterprises create case studies using internal company information, aiming for clarity which allows an employee to understand the problems presented.[8]
The MIT method is influenced by the Harvard method but is adapted for engineers.[citation needed] Participants are required to prepare an analysis and potential solution before a session to compare with the group's findings. At the end of the session, the instructor may share a "nearest correct solution" and the intended solution. Participants are encouraged to conduct individual research on the case study after the group session.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ Drury 1918, pp. 15–21, 292
- ^ "Taylorism | EBSCO Research Starters". www.ebsco.com. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
- ^ Hernandez y Rodriguez (September 1994). Introducción a la Administración [Management Introduction] (in Spanish). Vol. 1. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 67–70.
- ^ Mendez, Juan Nieto (March 1974). Las Artes de la Alta Dirección [The art of High Management] (in Spanish). Vol. 1. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 94–105.
- ^ a b Jones, Gareth (2010). "[Taking decisions learning, creativity, and entrepreneur spirit]". Administración Contemporanea [Contemporary Management] (in Spanish). Vol. 6. México: McGraw Hill. pp. 236–240.
- ^ Contreras J. (2010). "Estrategia Empresarial" [Enterprise Strategy] (in Spanish). Retrieved October 15, 2010.[dead link]
- ^ Mondy, Wayne (March 1991). "[The Planning Process]". In Peters, Jack (ed.). Management concepts, practices, and skills [Administracion conceptos, practicas y habilidades]. Vol. 5. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. pp. 134–195.
- ^ Eagan L. (1997). "The HBS Case in Action". Retrieved October 15, 2010.
Sources
[edit]- Drury, Horace Bookwalter (1918). "Scientific Management; A History and Criticism". Studies in History, Economics and Public Law (this is a re-print of Drury's 1915 PhD dissertation at Columbia). 65 (1, whole no. 157). Edited by the Faculty of Political Science of Columbia University: 100 – via Internet Archive (Cornell University Library)
.
