Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Cities/US Guideline and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
New Pope at Dolton, Illinois
[edit]
Several editors have added Pope Leo XIV to the lead of Dolton, Illinois, his childhood home.
My experience is that famous people aren't generally added to the lead of city articles.
Update...a photo of his house it there now too.
Your input at Talk:Dolton, Illinois#add Pope Leo XIV to the lede? would be appreciated. --Magnolia677 (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Need help at Kilgore, Texas
[edit]I've been struggling for a while to clean up Kilgore, Texas, where an editor outright does not support the US Cities guidelines. This is one example. Help from an experienced editor would be appreciated! --Magnolia677 (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Change to infobox
[edit]I'm proposing that we change the infobox's images to have each photo captioned individually, rather than using one big caption trying to describe each photo by its relative position. This feature is built-in to template it already uses to generate the collage. See the table below for an example.
Current layout | The layout I'm proposing | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
⇒ Aerrapc they/them, 15:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Better yet, have fewer images. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nice. My off-topic comment about collages... in general, they are overly abused in some articles, where editors try to shoehorn far too much stuff in this location. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 14:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
ACFR employment figures
[edit]Many US cities publish Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports which provide significant economic data, including income and employment figures; I find them interesting, especially when they include a comparison to the same stats from a decade ago.
I have transcribed several such cities' data tables into what I believe to be a reasonably-readable and useful table format, e.g.:
- Phoenix, Arizona#Employment
- Portland, Oregon#Top_Employers
- Lacey, Washington#Top_Employers
- Gardner, Kansas#Top_employers
Is this an acceptable level of detail, the correct way to display it, and can anything be done to improve how this information is presented? I would like feedback before continuing to implement it elsewhere. Thank you.
- OL25 OceanLoop (talk) 00:38, 12 July 2025 (UTC)