Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Feminism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:FEMINISM)
Main page Talk page Members Resources Popular pages

Cyberfeminism

[edit]

Cyberfeminism needs review by a subject matter expert. There's a paragraph that begins "See also" that includes a fragmented reference. I do not know what is intended. 176.108.139.1 (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:He Zhen (anarchist)#Requested move 23 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 03:08, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete of Dorothy Wear Walker Bush

[edit]

The attempt to speedily delete Dorothy Wear Walker Bush seems implicitly based on Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance. That looks like a clear WP:BIAS of the administrator proposing the deletion. Is there someplace in the community of Wikipedia editors where it makes sense to ask for additional input on this? Thanks! (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 23:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:Dorothy Wear Walker Bush#Contested deletion. WikiProject Politics might be a better place for an appropriate notice. I don't see Walker Bush's relation to this project beyond being a woman, and the accusation of bias seems hasty in this case. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 23:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of Maizie Barker-Welch

[edit]

Could someone please assess this stub as

  1. whether it is a Start-class article, and
  2. its importance to your project.

Thank you in advance. Bearian (talk) 00:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine#Requested move 18 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr (lets chat) 04:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Input needed on sourcing/synthesis issues in Femosphere article

[edit]

Hi all,

I’d appreciate any help reviewing the “radicalisation narratives” section of the Femosphere article, which was recently kept at AfD “without prejudice toward a rewrite to address NPOV and content issues.”

The section presents several ideological claims (e.g., rejection of liberal feminism, use of misandrist tropes) as signs of radicalisation. However:

  • none of the 7 cited sources define or group these claims into a cohesive radicalisation framework.
  • Several sources directly contradict the framing:

- The Guardian (citation 1) states: “There’s no evidence to say that the femosphere is radicalising its members in the same way as the manosphere…”

- Bullet 2 characterizes denying misandry/misogyny equivalence as a radicalization narrative, but cites The Independent (citation 9), an op-ed arguing against that equivalence, and Hedges (2024, citation 10), which critiques how misandry is weaponized against feminism; neither source supports the claim or uses fallacy/radicalization framing.

Some citations refer to the “womanosphere” rather than the “femosphere” which are different but overlapping terms (e.g., citation 6), yet the section synthesizes them into a single radicalization narrative. This raises concerns under WP:SYNTH.

Most citations are unquoted and lack attributed viewpoints, raising additional concerns under WP:V.

Would anyone be willing to take a look at the section and weigh in on what may be appropriate to bring it in line with sourcing and attribution policies?

Thanks so much,

HairlessPolarBear (talk) 20:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has requested that Frente Unico Pro Derechos de la Mujer be moved to Sole Front for Women's Rights., which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Spookyaki (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sexual diversity#Requested move 23 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. LIrala (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]