Wikipedia talk:Contact us
 | This talk page is not the place to ask questions, to report errors, or to contact Wikipedia.
This page is for discussion of the Contact us page itself.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contact us page. |
|
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talk pages of subpages of Wikipedia:Contact us redirect here. See the histories of each talk page for discussions prior to 26 September 2010. |
 | Wikipedia:Contact us is permanently protected from editing because it is a page that should not be edited significantly for legal or other reasons. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit.
|
 | Wikipedia:Contact us is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages. |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Reasons for contacting Wikipedia
I'm wondering why there isn't a category for reporting technical issues. Dismalscholar (talk) 03:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Can we get rid of the "back to main page" link? Also we still need to link to WP:RFO.
I know this is a nitpick, but since this page is linked in the footer of all pages on Wikipedia, the main page would likely be just be another page, not one a reader would want to go "back" to. The "back to main page" button is just clutter since they can just use the back button instead.
Also, I still stand by my critique from two years ago that it needs to be easier to get to WP:Oversight or WP:RFO from here. Someone who has been doxed, threatened, or defamed on Wikipedia will likely come to this page when looking for who to contact. Someone else mentioned a similar problem at /Archive 5#Threats of harm (again). PBZE (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Suggestions
The 'Contact us' page doesn't say how to make suggestions. I have a suggestion, so I ferreted around a bit to see where the best place to make it was, and came across (or stumbled across) Wikipedia talk:Contact us. Great, I thought, that'll be the place. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but it at least ought to mention suggestions, i.m.o., either by redirecting the reader or by explaining it here. Nick Barnett (talk) 20:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Premissons
I just got permission to add the photo from inat to this page. :) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/252698081#activity_comment_5f70d8f2-3ae1-4bc9-babb-06d78161a725 Lark999 (talk) 17:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 29 April 2025
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: I suggest that we add a hatnote to the subpage Article subjects to redirect people to WP:About you, as it’s really easy for people to accidentally type “WP:ABOUTYOU” instead of “WP:ABOUT YOU” in the search bar. Diff:
| − | + | {{redirects here|WP:ABOUTYOU|editing suggestions for your article|WP:About you}} |
HouseLiving roomDIY Fixings 00:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done It's not a good idea to add a hatnote to an extremely high-traffic page pointing to an extremely low-traffic essay. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:08, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
