Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Anime Recorder
[edit]Is Anime Recorder a reliable source? Homepage Example article. The website is dead though, so both links are from Wayback Machine. SuperGrey (talk) 07:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- It claims that its affiliated company is gamebiz.jp, and gamebiz.jp is a reliable source in the Chinese WikiProject Video games. So I think it is also a reliable source. 深鸣 (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable. Don't see any problems with it. silviaASH (inquire within) 11:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Febri
[edit]Is Febri a reliable source? It has a lot of interviews with seiyuus and staff. Website. Example article. SuperGrey (talk) 07:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'll claim it as a reliable source if no one disagrees. SuperGrey (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable. Used it myself as a source of interviews before. Should be noted that it is owned by Ichijinsha. silviaASH (inquire within) 11:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Eplus Spice
[edit]Eplus Spice also has a good amount of interviews. Website. Example article. Is this site a reliable source? SuperGrey (talk) 07:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable - ditto. SuperGrey (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable. Interviews and reports appear reliable, can't identify any issues. silviaASH (inquire within) 11:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Lis Ani!
[edit]Is Lis Ani! a reliable source? Website. Also a site of a lot of interviews. Example article. SuperGrey (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable - ditto. SuperGrey (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable. Also looks like a reliable source of interviews and reviews; not seeing any problems. silviaASH (inquire within) 11:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Anime Corner
[edit]It doesn't look like Anime Corner has been discussed before, but it appears to be reliable. I've already used it in articles like Suzume and BanG Dream! Ave Mujica without any issue. The editorial team appears to be experienced and qualified and the content looks good. silviaASH (inquire within) 11:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable - looks good to me. SuperGrey (talk) 12:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Reliable. A few years ago, I was skeptical about the site and had some reservations. However, they've proven to be more capable and thorough than I initially believed, plus they have conducted their own interviews,[1] which I feel gives them some authority and recognition. Xexerss (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Leaning Reliable - Anime Corner was discussed before a couple of times and over on the Video Game Project. Some cause for concern but overall reliable enough. DarkeruTomoe (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
ComicsVerse
[edit]Is ComicsVerse a reliable source? Website. Example article. The website is dead though, so both links are from Wayback Machine. 深鸣 (talk) 02:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)