Jump to content

User talk:Ophyrius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Xiphoid Vigour)

Question from Litoroa2 on Lotto New Zealand (00:36, 18 July 2025)

[edit]

Say hello --Litoroa2 (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
A barnstar for you!
Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – Destinyokhiria 💬 00:23, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RfC close

[edit]

RfC is supposed to run for at least 30 days. The RfC you closed here was only 15 days old.[5] You must undo your RfC close. Orientls (talk) 16:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Orientls! I had closed it as the consensus had been reached. Per policy an RFC can be closed early if a consensus has been reached. Also,the closure was actually requested at Wikipedia:Closure_requests and many users didn't object. But, if you think it hadn't reached consensus, feel free to revert it. Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
T • C • G
) 17:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:RFC. It specifically says that RfC sticks for at least 30 days. Unless you are saying that all of the users agreed over a single choice, then only you can say that the consensus was already reached but that was not the case. Yes a lot of problematic requests are placed on WP:ANRFC and they don't become legitimate only because they have been placed there. I don't understand why are you saying that nobody disputed it because WP:ANRFC is not the right place for disputing the closures. I am again asking you to revert your RfC close yourself, because your own revert will certainly prevent the unnecessary dispute. Thanks Orientls (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]