User talk:Wikideas1

File:Propetual motion wind powered vehicle concept.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Propetual motion wind powered vehicle concept.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

May 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Computational Chemistry, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have been adding Tex links, particularly those related to chemistry to a number of pages. In at least one case these have been reverted twice as not relevant. These additions also raise the question of whether you have an involvement in some of those Tex versions, in which case COI questions would arise. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Iron Man (2008 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to upload and insert your own created images randomly into articles. Wikipedia is NOT an image host to promote your own work. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Visi CAD/CAM

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Visi CAD/CAM.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article may not meet WP:GNG notability requirements. That requires multiple IDPENDENT sources (news outlets, for example) to discuss the product/company. The sources listed are from product's own website, or are minor technical documents, or from collaborating companies.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Visi CAD/CAM

Hello Wikideas1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Visi CAD/CAM, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visi CAD/CAM.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Autoship CAD/CAM

Hello Wikideas1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Autoship CAD/CAM, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoship CAD/CAM.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bunnypranav}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:27, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Mhchem moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mhchem. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least two and preferably three reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. There's useful information about how to choose good sources and avoid bad sources here. The source on ctan.tinycomputers.io is unverifiable, as the domain name does not resolve, but in any case you need more sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bella Render (software)

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Bella Render (software).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To meet WP notability requirements (WP:GNG) some independent sources must be provided. The article currently only has promotional press-release type sources; plus lots of internal company web sites. Independent 3rd part sources that discuss the product in-depth are required.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2025 (UTC)