User talk:Jkudlick

This is Jkudlick's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 30 days

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC second round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordi Amat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On deletion review

Hi Jkudlick, hope all is well. Just for future reference, if you're upset with an AfD closure, it is standard practice to ask the closing admin for clarification before going to deletion review. In the Greece-Turkey football case, I would have had no problem relisting the discussion. It's no big deal, but it can often save limited community time. Thanks for all your work around here, either way. Cheers! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: Thank you for the advice. I've been around long enough that I should have realized that. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! On the plus side, it looks like the AfD is now headed to a consensus, which is immensely preferable to anything else :). Best wishes, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CENT

About this revert: Multiple editors discussed the removal of the RFC from CENT. It's a snow close; even the lone opponent of the RFC agrees that we do not need to waste editors' time by asking them to WP:PILEON. I suggest that you self-revert.

On the more general subject, CENT and similar pages are most effective when they are shortest. Less is more, and having this unnecessary entry in the list makes CENT less effective at driving traffic to the discussions that need more responses. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]