User talk:Paleorthodox

A puppy for you!

Balsam Cottonwood has given you a puppy!

For being a follower of Jesus — and for those useful Christian userboxes you designed. Also, your talk page seems kind of unwelcoming with all those "Orphaned non-free image" notices and stuff, and I wanted to try to lighten it up a little.

Spread the goodness of puppies by adding {{subst:Puppy}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 04:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Balsam! God bless you. Paleorthodox (talk) 05:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 05:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

I like your userbox, {{User:Paleorthodox/Intelligent design}}. It seems a shame that the article for the link to intelligent design isn't very nice, though. At the very beginning it says, "Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins"... etc. I see that someone tried to get them to remove "pseudoscientific" from only the short description template, as you can see here, but the attempts were dismissed and put in a collapsible box marked "Time wasted with claptrap." The world is very disrespectful to its Creator, isn't it? 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 13:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your input. Yeah, it's disappointing to see how Wikipedia treats the Creator. I stay off Wikipedia's theology articles because they are more than willing to add false information and remove anything they consider too conservative. Paleorthodox (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I thought "neutral" meant... well, neutral! 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 04:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FresnoGrizzliesLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FresnoGrizzliesLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]