User talk:Glenn23-408649

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Glenn23-408649! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Gunther : Talk 10:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome in Wikipedia

Your are not removing the sports events finale on all years in Philippine Television articles were the end of championship 2001:4453:6DF:8E00:58DF:589B:B38D:D7AB (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 in Philippine television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal of all sports article ended does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 2001:4453:61A:BA00:89AF:825F:1EAF:DE7E ^talk! 00:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.33.98 (talk) [reply]

Please stop the reverted and redirected to other links and you not removing sports events of all years of Philippine television archives such as ending of championship of Sports League in the Philippines 49.144.33.98 (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to remove the Sports Events entry from Wikipedia due to several reasons related to Wikipedia's editing guidelines. Wikipedia emphasizes verifiability and the importance of reliable sources; if the entry is backed by credible references and has been deemed significant by the community, it may be protected from removal. Additionally, if I lack a consensus among editors or if the content is considered notable within the context of Philippine television history, my edits might be reverted. Engaging in discussion on the article's talk page could provide clarity on the community's stance and help me to understand the rationale behind the content's inclusion. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When the championship of NCAA Basketball and Volleyball, Premier Volleyball League (formerly Shakey's V-League), Spiker's Turf, UAAP Basketball and Volleyball and other was added to all years of Philippine television article is not reverted the edit here and redicted to other links was accept it 2001:4453:603:C600:CD81:24:69A4:FCDD (talk) 05:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice without your reasons

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced and unexplained content (as well as removal more specific wikilinks to main redirects), as you did at 2023 in Philippine television, you may be blocked from editing. Icarus58 (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just fixed the articles. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my explanation, the removal of specific wikilinks to main redirects typically occurs to streamline content and enhance clarity. When a page contains multiple links pointing to a redirect, it can create confusion for readers who might expect to find distinct information. By consolidating these links, editors aim to maintain a cleaner and more navigable structure, ensuring that users are directed to the most relevant and comprehensive articles. This practice also helps to prevent redundancy and improves the overall coherence of the text, allowing readers to focus on the primary subject without being sidetracked by multiple redirects. Ultimately, this approach aligns with Wikipedia's goal of providing accurate and easily accessible information. Please understand this and don't block me. Thank you so much. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I convinced you all your assumptions are true, but be careful for my word: If you will violated the rules under the WP:DAB, Manual of Styles in Linking, Do's and Don'ts in Redirects and other main articles and piping policy; you will report from the interventions against vandalism if you continue to remove the specific wikilinks without any excuses.

Any subsequent edits (as well as years in Philippine Television articles) will reverted manually. Thank you.

Icarus58 (talk) 14:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specific links per WP:DAB (Disambiguation pages), WP:PIPE (Pipe links), and WP:MOSLINK (Mos links) are removed to maintain clarity and readability in Wikipedia articles. Disambiguation pages are used to distinguish between different meanings of a term, and unnecessary links can confuse readers. Pipe links are used to directly access a specific section or page, and redundant or irrelevant links can clutter the page and detract from the main content. Mos links are used to link to a specific section within a page, and removing unnecessary links helps to keep the page organized and easy to navigate. Overall, removing these types of links helps to ensure that Wikipedia articles are clear, concise, and easy to use. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 in Philippine television. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism and remove all specific wikilinks (which may confused into main redirects), may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 12:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, any subsequent comments regarding to the policies without those instructions above or not to follow these guidelines will automatically reverted. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 12:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update the anniversary celebration for Word of God Network

Hi, Glen! Can you ask to add the important events for the religious program of Christ's Commission Fellowship's Word of God Network at 2024 in Philippine television? Since they officially closed for the program in 9 years and 1 week ago on TV5 and broadcast by PTV (almost 4 years) according to CCF. Thank you for my understanding! ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 02:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 14:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entirely unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glenn23-408649! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 in Philippine television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inquirer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update for the stopped airing in 2023 and 2024

Dear Glen, I'll hope that you feeling good better. The 2023 and 2024 in Philippine television needs to be updated in all programming tv channels. Here's the official FB page for TelePinoy to see all the archive programming schedules for 2023 and 2024 respectively: [1]

In addition, Flames of Vengeance will resumed on January 1, 2025 due to the pre-empted by the countdown concert of Kapuso Countdown to 2025: [2]

So, if you want to communicate further as well as formatting references (in APA citation), please let us know on my talk page. Thank you. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 10:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you don't have to put a program on stopped airing because the special program is short and only lasts one day. You'll put it like that when a special program isn't over yet. Thanks. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 13:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I cannot access Telepinoy's FB page because they already blocked me even though, I already logged on my Facebook account. Thanks. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Glen, I understand your reasons why they've blocked to your social media account — even for those contributors haven't participated yet in the stopped airing on those television channels last 3 years (exceptionally for Holy Week in Thursday and Friday). So, thank you very much for your concerns and wish a wonderful new year of succession.🎉🎉🎉 Happy editing! 😊 ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 17:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Icarus58. The challenge of maintaining consistent and reliable citations on Wikipedia stems from several intertwined factors. Wikipedia is a collaborative platform with contributions from a vast and diverse group of volunteers globally, each bringing different levels of expertise and familiarity with citation guidelines. This diversity inevitably leads to variations in how references are formatted. Additionally, the wide range of sources cited on Wikipedia, including books, journal articles, websites, and news articles, each have their preferred citation styles. Adapting these varied sources to fit a uniform style is not always straightforward. While Wikipedia provides templates and tools to help standardize citations, these tools are not universally used by all editors, and some templates may not cover every possible citation scenario. A significant amount of citation formatting is still performed manually, which introduces the possibility of human error and differing interpretations of guidelines. Furthermore, updating old citations to match current standards is a labor-intensive process that may not always be prioritized. Date formatting presents another layer of complexity. Although the ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD) is precise and unambiguous, not all sources use this format. Wikipedia aims to balance international readability with adherence to local conventions, leading to variations in date formats. Overall, while Wikipedia strives for consistency in its citation framework, the collaborative and diverse nature of the platform, the variety of sources, and the manual editing processes make achieving perfect consistency challenging. However, the community continually works towards improving citation practices to ensure reliability and accuracy. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Glenn, please read the official citation format for citing sources guidelines. Also, please refrain that the ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD) (ex. 2023-06-28) is precise and unambiguous, not all sources use this format; however, it is not also acceptable with the official APA format to emphasize the reliability and credibility of the readers. To avoid this being suspicious (assuming good faith edits), use only the official format of the date of publishment in citation format (ex. June 28, 2023) to ensure the quality and verifiable sources can met. So, I revert for now due to the improper format (dates) in the references, as well as extra spacing. If you want to learn more about the citation format, please read the following guidelines: WP:REFB, WP:CITEVAR and WP:CITESTYLE to ensure the stability and the citation format must be followed the instructions for the styling guidelines. Thank you so much for your concerns. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 12:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus58, after reading that, all the references are correct. So stop interfering with my hard-earned and well-organized Wikipedia edits. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I stop, since I'm currently contribute for the coordinators as well as the trustworthy editors? @Glenn, please read the WP:AGF guidelines to calm down your actions and other rules, even your reference guidelines and removed unexplained content didn't follow those instructions in my concerns. Most of the bots explained the formal structure format to make it easier and manageable for citing sources. I'm sorry for being patience, but if you want to collaborate with the WikiProjects, please let us know. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 23:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pamilya Sagrado episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, please don't remove the articles while the championship of NCAA, PVL and UAAP is added to 2024 in Philippine Television articles (as Finales) 49.144.32.44 (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 49.144.32.44, removing the NCAA, PVL, and UAAP from "Finale" programs in 2024 could be justified by a desire to prioritize professional leagues, which often feature higher-level competition, greater production values, and larger fan bases, potentially leading to increased viewership and revenue for the program organizers. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the a desire to prioritize professional leagues as a premieres and finales was added to all years in Philippine television articles, thank you 49.144.32.44 (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do that. Thanks Glenn23-408649 (talk) 11:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

for example

PBA on TV5 - ended on August 20, 2008, it is also sports championship game is automatic as finales for years in Philippine Television article (from 1960s to present) 49.144.32.44 (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its ok to put championships on events only instead of putting on finales. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 11:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 22, 2022 - the finales of The Bureau of Magical Things (later replaced by Wolfblood season 1 on May 29, 2022) and NCAA Season 98 Men's Basketball Tournaments aired on GTV

The sports championships on events and putting to finales only (from 1953 in Philippine television to 2025 in Philippine television) is allow to edit the sports championship only 49.144.32.44 (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok to put the sports programs airing on their respective channels on returning and transferring programs. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 08:42, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Glen, it is not okay to eliminate the finale date for each sports programs. Likewise the mention of JRGuevarra, the respective championship of events like NCAA, PVL, UAAP, etc. shall rely on its finale list since it is a seasonal event before the replacements of its program. Thank you for my notice. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 13:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you said from the IP user,

...without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal of all sports article ended does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted...

But given on its circumstance, it seems that your edit summary in 2023 and 2024 in Philippine television, when you removed the finale date of its seasonal event sports programs — since they are notable without giving a reasons: "Updated the debut, finale and returning programs" is not also provide an exonerated proof the general consensus from the Wikipedia's guidelines and may it unconstructive. Be mindful for your edits to support reasons on its edit summary for sports event television programs, especially for piping links to avoid confusion the readers. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 13:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus58 (talk), I'm just follow the formats given, it's ok to put some seasonal event sports programs on returning or transferring programs only. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since the sports television programs (like NCAA, PVL, PBA etc.) are also part from the seasonal events only, must be included for finale dates to avoid the unknown reasons to remove since they are reliable when the archive posts can be forgotten or no longer that before. So, if you try remove the finale dates of its sports television programs without providing any consensus of its editors, it may be unconstructive and reverted manually. Please follow for my instructions. Thank you. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 02:09, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus58 (talk), sports seasonal events must include them only in the returning or transferring programs. I hope you understand this. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Glenn, please see the 2018 and 2019 in Philippine televisions since they are included for the debut, returning programs and finales for the sports event programs (even they are seasonal). Thank you. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 23:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus58 (talk), although I saw the 2018 and 2019 in Philippine televisions, I am just following the format. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) did not include the leagues for sports event programs (even they are seasonal) in the debut, returning programs and finales. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Glenn23-408649: First off, I have no idea what you guys talk about this discussion and just stumbled across after being mentioned here as I have no heavily interest in editing Philippine television related articles anymore when I returned from my long hiatus (well, only the selected ones that I usually do in a minor concept), but I have to agree and disagree with both of you here for two things: (1) there's no such thing as a "format"; (2) however, it may only applied to "Events" (only for network transfer and big sporting events like Olympics), "Returning or renamed programs" and "Programs transferring networks" sections as "Debuts" and "Finales" sections should only be used to all TV programs and programming blocks (whether original or acquired, minus the seasonal sports league ones as its practices are similar to the American counterpart articles) as per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 12:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update

2025 in Philippine television

Upcoming

January 27: Yo-kai Watch

Scheduled

January 24: Knockout (rerun)

158.62.19.93 (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Posted already. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Glen, please see for the TelePinoy's official FB page (on March 30, 2025) for the stopped airing on Aplikante. Thank you. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 12:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Icarus58 (talk). I can't see the posts from TelePinoy's official facebook page, maybe they blocked me, and I've already told you before that there's no need to put a program on stopped airing, like Aplikante which is aired on TV5. They're aired on weekends, especially on Saturday, so there's no need to put a stopped airing for Sunday. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this, Aplikante will returns on April 5 (Saturday) because it stopped airing last March 29 (last Saturday) and on March 30 (Sunday), this is the official pre-empted by the special program for PhilPop Himig Handog 2025. Hence, it is still included for the stopped airing for a week, so you have no choice for revert that. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 00:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus58 (talk), like what was done with Mega Blockbusters in 2024, their last aired was on December 8, and it was not aired from December 14 and 15. It returned on December 21, so it had permission to be put on stopped airing. It did not put on stopped airing when Miss Universe 2024 aired because it did not have permission and it still aired on November 16. You have permission to put a weekend program on stopped airing if it is not aired on Saturday and Sunday, unless it is aired only on Saturday or Sunday. Well, the Aplikante aired on weekends, so there is no need to put it on stopped airing as it relates to Sunday and you should stop that. Thank you. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sincerely apologize, but you should stop this to remove this stopped airing without providing an exonerated proof, even on the consecutive weekends to avoid misunderstandings per WP:NOTHERE and WP:CLEARLY. As such, please do not transposed in advance the date of releasing a debuts on the current time zone (ex. June 5: Back from the Brink which you transposed on June 3/4). In the accordance of the policies on Wikipedia, please use the talk page instead per WP:ONUS guidelines to generate a clearer consensus — period. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 01:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now Icarus58 (talk), while the idea of having a dedicated Weekend program entry on Wikipedia might appear justified on the surface, a broader perspective supports that there is no strong imperative to allocate a separate Wikipedia article for such programming given its ephemeral nature and the conditional context of broadcast. The weekend program, which is scheduled to air on both Saturdays and Sundays even as it remains listed under a "stopped airing" status, essentially blurs the lines between a consistently running segment and a one-off special scheduling event . This conditional nature suggests that the program has not achieved a status that warrants standalone encyclopedic documentation because its broadcast pattern remains indistinct and subject to periodic deviations, particularly when compared to programs of sustained cultural or historical significance. Moreover, in an ecosystem with limited editorial bandwidth, creating dedicated entries for programs that are not continuously active or do not meet established notability guidelines risks cluttering the content and diluting the overall informational value for readers . Incorporating mentions of this weekend programming within the broader context of Philippine television episodes or channel programming schedules instead of a separate article enables editors to focus on subjects that have clearer, more consistent contributions to media culture . Additionally, existing coverage of special weekend programming within the main articles about channels or seasonal programming inherently satisfies the documentation needs for interested viewers and researchers alike, preserving the historical record without redundancy. Consequently, the combination of fluctuating broadcast schedules, non-continuous airing, and sufficient representation within broader contextual articles provides a clear, exonerated proof that a separate weekend program listing on Wikipedia is unnecessary, ensuring that the encyclopedia maintains a balanced, accurate, and non-redundant reflection of Philippine television programming history. Therefore, by recognizing that specialized documentation is unwarranted for transient broadcasts, Wikipedia upholds both efficiency and clarity in its record-keeping practices. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Glen, I will forward acknowledge the suggestions on WikiProject Philippines for your request and support. Thank you so much. If you want to collaborate for those Philippine related WikiProjects, please let me know. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 02:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I'm WhiteStar2000. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gloria Romero have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WhiteStar2000 (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WhiteStar2000,it's ok to use Gloria Anne Romero Borrego Galla instead of known professionally as Gloria Romero. So please revert on my last revision. Thanks. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 12:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edits to Vivoree Esclito's page

Hello. I am letting you know why your unnecessary "fixes" to Vivoree Esclito's page are being reverted. Do not edit them back in and please understand why they are being reverted.

Removal of "known mononymously as Vivoree" — This was used to distinguish from her real full name, which is not used professionally, and the single stage name that she is professionally known as. An example from Marina Diamandis, which has Good Article status: Marina Lambrini Diamandis (/ˌdiːəˈmændɪs/ ⓘ DEE-ə-MAN-diss; Greek: Μαρίνα-Λαμπρινή Διαμάντη, romanized: Marína-Lampriní Diamánti; born 10 October 1985), known mononymously as Marina (often stylised in all caps) and previously by the stage name Marina and the Diamonds, is a Welsh singer, songwriter, poet and record producer.

"In 2016, she joined ABS-CBN's reality competition show Pinoy Big Brother that interrupted her education." You changed the original prose to this, but it is a grammatically incorrect sentence. There was nothing wrong with the prose that you "fixed."

Changing "The Philippine Daily Inquirer" to INQUIRER.net goes against style guidelines. Sources should not be listed as ".com" or ".net" but simply the publication name.

Also, you changing the archive.today link to archive.md, for some reason, broke the archive link. The archive.md link doesn't work. Archive.today is accepted on the site. Please don't change archive links with no valid reason because you'll break them. Changing "Cite" to "cite" (all lowercase) is also entirely unnecessary; please do not put your energy into "fixing" that, because both are accepted and most sources in the article use the capitalized version anyway.

Edit because you made so many unconstructive edits: I just saw as well that you removed the ref name tags. PLEASE do not do that. This has orphaned many lines in the article, leaving them with no reference. Every time you make an edit, please ensure that it is done with good reason and does not break the article instead.

Also, it says at the very top of the article: Use mdy dates|date=September 2021

Dates in the sources should go in this order: month first, then day, then year. Do not change it to ymd (e.g. changing "November 30, 2024" to "2024-11-30", as you did multiple times in your edits). I see that you have already been warned before about changing date formats.

Please refrain from making these kinds of "fixes" again and understand why they are being reverted. Bloomagiliw (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the update. Vivoree Esclito is not professional in here career. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes to Wil to Win, in addition to the source names, please do not remove the archive-url, it serves as backup if sources become dead. Do not remove the translation for the Tagalog citation titles as well as it serves as aid for readers/editors who are non-Filipino/Tagalog speakers. The quotes also gives the relevant text supporting a claim in the articles.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also no need to change the date format especially {{use mdy}} or {{use dmy}} at the top automatically changes the format in the cite uniformly. So it Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:12, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just fixed the fix citations and archives. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 08:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question for the additional stopped airing regarding to the Holy Week

Hello Glen, if there are some programs that aired every Saturdays (ex. Healing Galing, Pinoy M.D.) on each network, should be add on its list for the stopped on its Holy Week due to the programming break? As such, I'm also busy to edit/revert some of those important articles and drafts need for an expansion (like tropical cyclones, television programs, etc.). I hope you'll do it well soon. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 10:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Icarus58 (talk), programs that aired every Saturdays (ex. Healing Galing, Pinoy M.D.) on each network will not add on stopped airing just like in previous Holy Week years. Please understand this, thanks. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And take note, please do not use mentioned for my signature as Icarus58 (talk) on its significant communications. It may reduced the attention of the editors/readers, as well as the official admins. Instead, use the official ping as @Icarus58 or none to ensure the quality of conservative suggestions on its user page or any contributors want to know on its significant community. So, take care and happy editing. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 21:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question please the revert of Gino March

First, Gino removed all acquired programming aired on Philippine television and movie block excluded, many reason that Gino's disruptive edits may lead to the behavioral actions — including the declining all my response without any additional evidence and that all foreign television programs are MOS:TVINTL shall be removed unless there is a notable and verified sources 2001:4453:62B:4300:683B:15DC:A61D:20D7 (talk) 02:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Icarus58 (talk) revert edits from Gino March (talk) because all acquired programs are included. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 11:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will take the step closer to check the behavioral patterns for Gino's edit. Any evidences will report to WP:ANI. Thank you for a clarification. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 05:28, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 07:29, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Warning for your disruptive edits. In your recent edits to the articles on Rhian Ramos and Julia Barretto, you changed the access date of one of the references to the publication date, which is incorrect. The access date refers to when the source was retrieved, while the publication date refers to when the source was originally published — these are clearly different and should not be confused. Also, avoid using the term “fixed” in edit summaries when no actual corrections were made. Additionally, do not modify the lead sections of biographical articles unless there is a clear violation of Wikipedia’s standards. If the lead is not broken, do not attempt to fix it. - ArćRèv • talk 18:24, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TheArcRev, the access date refers to the specific day when a user retrieves or views a source, while the publication date is the original date when the source was made publicly available by its author or publisher. These dates are different because online sources, particularly webpages, can be updated, modified, or even removed over time. For researchers and Wikipedia editors, including the access date is crucial when citing online sources since it helps verify exactly what was available at the time of reference. While it would be convenient if both dates matched, especially for Wikipedia editors aiming for consistency, the reality is that digital content often evolves, making the distinction necessary for accurate citation and historical context. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally TheArcRev for Rhian Ramos, maybe better to just say "known", instead of "profesionally known". Glenn23-408649 (talk) 02:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eugene Domingo, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 12:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but I already cleaned up the mess. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Glenn23-408649: Please stop changing access dates to publication dates in references. Access dates indicate when the source was retrieved, not when it was published. You've already been informed about this, yet you continue making the same disruptive edits. If this continues, I will report you to the Administrator's Noticeboard. - ArćRèv • talk 12:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheArcRev, I did not change the access dates and publication dates as of now. I hope you understand this because I am also fixing edits on Wikipedia and please don't blocked me indefinitely. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 12:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Rodriguez. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arćrèv1 • talk 06:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've removed "professionally" again in lead sections, but this doesn't improve the articles. In cases like Kim Rodriguez, her professional name is clearly different from her birth name, so "professionally known as" is accurate and should stay. You've already been warned. If you still believe your edits are correct, start a proper discussion and gain consensus first. If you're not improving the article, it's better to focus on other topics. - Arćrèv1 • talk 06:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kim Domingo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arcrev1 (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 in Philippine sports. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please read again the previous warnings on your talk page for further information. Borgenland (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgenland, listen! This date, 2025-07-25, not only represents the actual event date but also serves a dual purpose when used in the ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD)—it can reasonably be interpreted as the access date for the citation, especially when the edit was made shortly after the game concluded. Assuming good faith edits, contributors who updated the article on July 25 likely accessed and cited sources published on the same day, such as Rappler, GMA News, which promptly reported the Beermen’s victory. Therefore, using 2025-07-25 as the access date aligns with both the event's timing and the immediacy of media coverage, making it a valid and contextually accurate choice over a later access date like July 26, 2025. This practice reflects Wikipedia’s collaborative nature, where editors often update entries in real time, trusting that others will refine and verify details as more information became available as per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Glenn23-408649 (talk) 03:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The timestamp[3] clearly states that @Jfect22 uploaded the original information on 26 July, meaning that they most likely accessed it on that day. What you are doing is mere tampering with the record as previously warned by @Arcrev1 Borgenland (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]