User talk:LIrala

Welcome!

Hi 96z! I noticed your contributions to History of transgender people in Brazil and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 23:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for your recommendation on Transgender! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) \| :) \| he/him \| 05:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Would I be correct to guess that it was just finger trouble that made you tag your edit to gender symbol as "minor"? If not, could you take a moment to skim wp:minor edits, please. (No issue with the edit itself.)

No need to reply or even acknowledge. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was minor because I didn't add anything new, I reused a source, and that source exists since 2020 and already referenced such symbols before. LIrala (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what "minor edits" mean. ^SMason_Garrison 01:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:Minor edits: "Any change affecting an article's meaning is not minor, even if it concerns a single word." JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 00:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm going to pay attention and take care next time. LIrala (talk) 04:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Discrimination against LGBTQ people

added a link pointing to Aphobia

Outline of LGBTQ topics

added a link pointing to Homosexuality in football

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Intersectional feminists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Intersectional feminists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black feminists has been nominated for renaming

Category:Black feminists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review how categorization works. There's a lot of policies related to non-defining intersections, that are relevant Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people ^SMason_Garrison 01:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Onu (pronoun), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neuter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about ⚪︎

Hello, LIrala

I edit here too, under the username Miminity and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect ⚪︎, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § ⚪︎.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 30 § Sexual Anomalies until a consensus is reached. LIrala (talk) 02:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 28 § List of sexualities until a consensus is reached. LIrala (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 07:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic alert

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TarnishedPath^talk 07:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]