Template:Did you know nominations/KWHY

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif talk 03:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

KWHY

(

)

... that the court-appointed receiver for a California TV station noted that the business "at least equal[ed] the most poorly managed companies I've seen"? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-los-angeles-times-station-sale-expe/69885929/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Killing of Samir Flores Soberanes

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 761 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Earwig only complains about some stuff covered by WP:LIMITED. Plagiarism spot checks as of Special:Permalink/1288286502: ref 5 is clear; ref 12 is clear; ref 26 doesn't mention Riklis, but not everything requires an inline citation and it supports the second half of the sentence without copyvio (I really hope that Riklis realized how much he lived up to his name); 39 is clear; 49 is clear. Great work :) House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)